Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Field Theoretic Study of Bilayer Membrane Fusion. I. Hemifusion Mechanism

Open access
Katsov, K., Müller, M., Schick, M.·2004·Biophysical Journal

Abstract

Self-consistent field theory is used to determine structural and energetic properties of metastable intermediates and unstable transition states involved in the standard stalk mechanism of bilayer membrane fusion. A microscopic model of flexible amphiphilic chains dissolved in hydrophilic solvent is employed to describe these self-assembled structures. We find that the barrier to formation of the initial stalk is much smaller than previously estimated by phenomenological theories. Therefore its creation it is not the rate-limiting process. The relevant barrier is associated with the rather limited radial expansion of the stalk into a hemifusion diaphragm. It is strongly affected by the architecture of the amphiphile, decreasing as the effective spontaneous curvature of the amphiphile is made more negative. It is also reduced when the tension is increased. At high tension the fusion pore, created when a hole forms in the hemifusion diaphragm, expands without bound. At very low membrane tension, small fusion pores can be trapped in a flickering metastable state. Successful fusion is severely limited by the architecture of the lipids. If the effective spontaneous curvature is not sufficiently negative, fusion does not occur because metastable stalks, whose existence is a seemingly necessary prerequisite, do not form at all. However if the spontaneous curvature is too negative, stalks are so stable that fusion does not occur because the system is unstable either to a phase of stable radial stalks, or to an inverted-hexagonal phase induced by stable linear stalks. Our results on the architecture and tension needed for successful fusion are summarized in a phase diagram.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1529/biophysj.103.038943

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Katsov, K., Müller, M., & Schick, M.
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
87
Issue
5
Pages
3277-3290
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991807262
Cited by
167
References
3
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field Theoretic Study of Bilayer Membrane Fusion. I. Hemifusion Mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1529/biophysj.103.038943
The paper
Katsov, K., Müller, M., & Schick, M. (2004). Field Theoretic Study of Bilayer Membrane Fusion. I. Hemifusion Mechanism. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.103.038943

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.