Cited by 57Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Variability in the detection of macro TSH in different immunoassay systems

Hattori, Naoki, Ishihara, Takashi, Shimatsu, Akira·2016·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Design: Macro TSH is a large molecular-sized TSH that is mostly a complex of TSH and IgG. Patients with macro TSH have elevated serum TSH and normal free thyroxine levels, mimicking subclinical hypothyroidism. The aim of this study was to clarify the degree of cross-reactivity of macro TSH to different commercial immunoassay systems. Methods: Screening for macro TSH was done using a polyethylene glycol (PEG) method and confirmed with gel filtration chromatography in serum samples from 1901 patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. Interference due to human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) was examined using HAMA blockers. TSH was measured with an enzyme immunoassay for the analysis of macro TSH. Serum TSH values in patients with macro TSH were also determined with the widely used commercial immunoassay platforms Elecsys, Centaur and Architect, and the detectability of macro TSH was compared among them. Results: Gel filtration chromatography was performed with 174 serum samples with PEG-precipitable TSH ratios >75%. Twenty serum samples were found to contain large molecular-sized TSH, five of which were due to interference by HAMA. The prevalence of macro TSH was eventually 0.79% (15/1901). Commercial immunoassay systems variably recognized macro TSH. The Architect TSH immunoassay platform was the least reactive to macro TSH, but still recognized it in 60% of macro TSH-containing serum samples. Conclusions: There were no commercial TSH immunoassay platforms that did not cross-react with macro TSH. Screening for macro TSH should be performed before hormone replacement therapy is initiated for subclinical hypothyroidism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje-15-0883

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hattori, N., Ishihara, T., & Shimatsu, A.
Affiliations
  • Ritsumeikan University (JP)
  • Kyoto Medical Center (JP)
Corresponding author
Hattori, Naoki
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2016-01
Volume
174
Issue
1
Pages
9-15
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2177853440
Cited by
57
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25460232)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
subclinical hypothyroidism, human anti-mouse antibodies, assay interference, polyethylene glycol precipitation, TSH receptor antibodies
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic, Chromatography, Gel, False Negative Reactions, Female, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoassay, Male, Middle Aged, Molecular Weight, Polyethylene Glycols, Chemical Precipitation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thyroid Hormones, Thyrotropin, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review