The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A survey of pituitary incidentaloma in Japan
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The development of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has resulted in the discovery of unsuspected endocrinologically silent pituitary masses (pituitary incidentalomas). The aim of this study was to perform a national survey on pituitary incidentalomas in order to establish an appropriate approach to them. DESIGN AND METHODS: Five hundred and six patients with pituitary incidentalomas were obtained by questionnaire from March 1999 to May 2000 under the auspices of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients underwent surgery (surgical group), while 248 patients were followed up conservatively for a mean period of 26.9 Months (range 6-173 Months) (non-surgical group). Clinical and biochemical assessment, CT or MRI of the pituitary, and visual field testing by Goldman perimetry were assessed at baseline and 6 Months and Yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with pituitary incidentalomas (13.3%) developed tumor enlargement during the mean follow-up period of 45.5 Months. Of 115 estimated non-functioning adenomas, 23 tumors (20.0%) increased during a mean follow-up period of 50.7 Months (range 10-173 Months), while 5 of 94 (5.3%) estimated Rathke's cysts increased in size during follow-up. Pituitary apoplexy occurred in one of 248 patients (0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Pituitary incidentalomas usually follow a benign course. We recommend transsphenoidal adenectomy for a solid mass attached to the optic chiasma estimated to be a pituitary adenoma by MRI. Other patients should be followed up by MRI every 6 Months for the first 2 Years, and then Yearly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diagnosis and Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas: A Review
Molitch, M. E. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.19699 · Cited by 933
Incidence of Pituitary Adenomas in Northern Finland in 1992–2007
Raappana, A., Koivukangas, J., Ebeling, T., & Pirilä, T. (2010) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-0537 · Cited by 470
Trifanescu, R., Ansorge, O., Wass, J. A. H., Grossman, A. B., & Karavitaki, N. (2012) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04235.x · Cited by 175
Molitch, M. E. (2009) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2009.05.001 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanno, N., Oyama, K., Tahara, S., Teramoto, A., & Kato, Y.
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-127
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2162729805
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey of pituitary incidentaloma in Japan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/eje.0.1490123
- The paper
- Sanno, N., Oyama, K., Tahara, S., Teramoto, A., & Kato, Y. (2003). A survey of pituitary incidentaloma in Japan. European Journal of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1490123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.