Cited by 180Hormonal and reproductive studiesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Empirical estimation of free testosterone from testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin immunoassays

Ly, Lam P, Handelsman, David J·2005·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Background: The growing interest in measuring blood free testosterone (FT) is constrained by the unsuitability of the laborious reference methods for wider adoption in routine diagnostic laboratories. Various alternative derived testosterone measures have been proposed to estimate FT from either additional assay steps or calculations using total testosterone (TT) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) measured in the same sample. However, none have been critically validated in large numbers of blood samples. Methods: We analyzed a large dataset comprising over 4000 consecutive blood samples in which FT as well as TT and SHBG were measured. Dividing the dataset into samples with blood TT above and below 5 nM, using a bootstrap regression modeling approach guided by Akaike Information Criterion for model selection to balance parsimony against reduction of residual error, empirical equations were developed for FT in terms of TT and SHBG. Results: Comparison between the empirical FT equations with the laboratory FT measurements as well as three widely used calculated FT methods showed the empirical FT formulae had superior fidelity with laboratory measurements while previous FT formulae overestimated and deviated systematically from the laboratory FT values. Conclusion: We conclude that these simple, assumption-free empirical FT equations can estimate accurately blood FT from TT and SHBG measured in the same samples with the present assay methods and have suitable properties for wider application to evaluate the clinical utility of blood FT measurements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje.1.01844

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ly, L. P., & Handelsman, D. J.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Handelsman, David J
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2005-03
Volume
152
Issue
3
Pages
471-478
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2125097866
Cited by
180
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
free testosterone, total testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, bootstrap regression, model selection, Akaike information criterion
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Immunoassay, Male, Models, Biological, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Testosterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review