Empirical estimation of free testosterone from testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin immunoassays
Abstract
Background: The growing interest in measuring blood free testosterone (FT) is constrained by the unsuitability of the laborious reference methods for wider adoption in routine diagnostic laboratories. Various alternative derived testosterone measures have been proposed to estimate FT from either additional assay steps or calculations using total testosterone (TT) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) measured in the same sample. However, none have been critically validated in large numbers of blood samples. Methods: We analyzed a large dataset comprising over 4000 consecutive blood samples in which FT as well as TT and SHBG were measured. Dividing the dataset into samples with blood TT above and below 5 nM, using a bootstrap regression modeling approach guided by Akaike Information Criterion for model selection to balance parsimony against reduction of residual error, empirical equations were developed for FT in terms of TT and SHBG. Results: Comparison between the empirical FT equations with the laboratory FT measurements as well as three widely used calculated FT methods showed the empirical FT formulae had superior fidelity with laboratory measurements while previous FT formulae overestimated and deviated systematically from the laboratory FT values. Conclusion: We conclude that these simple, assumption-free empirical FT equations can estimate accurately blood FT from TT and SHBG measured in the same samples with the present assay methods and have suitable properties for wider application to evaluate the clinical utility of blood FT measurements.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Free T algorithms can be divided into three categories: linear mass action, non-linear allosteric, and empirical bootstrap.
“A wide spectrum of algorithms for free T exists, which can broadly be divided into three categories (Table 6).”
From Role of sex hormone-binding globulin in the free hormone hypothesis and the relevance of free testosterone in androgen physiology (2022) · cites this paper as [214]
The third category of free T models uses empirical bootstrap regression methods on cohort datasets.
“Empirical models exploiting bootstrap regression methods on cohort datasets comprise the third and last category [214, 215].”
From Role of sex hormone-binding globulin in the free hormone hypothesis and the relevance of free testosterone in androgen physiology (2022) · cites this paper as [214]
Additional factors that may account for variability include specimen handling and preparation, calibration methods, specimen commutability, and interference from matrix material used to store and transport testosterone preparations.
“Additional factors, which may account for variability of results include specimen handling and preparation, calibration methods utilized, specimen commutability, and interference from the matrix material used to store and transport sample T preparations.”
From Challenges in Testosterone Measurement, Data Interpretation, and Methodological Appraisal of Interventional Trials (2016) · cites this paper as [89]
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965 · see citing works
A Critical Evaluation of Simple Methods for the Estimation of Free Testosterone in Serum
Vermeulen, A., Verdonck, L., & Kaufman, J. M. (1999) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.84.10.6079 · Cited by 3,824 · see citing works
Immunoassays for Testosterone in Women: Better than a Guess?
Herold, D. A., & Fitzgerald, R. L. (2003) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/49.8.1250 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rosner, W., Auchus, R. J., Azziz, R., Sluss, P. M., & Raff, H. (2007) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1864 · Cited by 1,176 · see citing works
A Reappraisal of Testosterone’s Binding in Circulation: Physiological and Clinical Implications
Goldman, A. L., Bhasin, S., Wu, F. C. W., Krishna, M., Matsumoto, A. M., & Jasuja, R. (2017) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2017-00025 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Low Free Testosterone Predicts Frailty in Older Men: The Health in Men Study
Hyde, Z., Flicker, L., Almeida, O. P., Hankey, G. J., McCaul, K. A., Chubb, S. A. P., & Yeap, B. B. (2010) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2009-2754 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
West, D. W. D., Burd, N. A., Tang, J. E., Moore, D. R., Staples, A. W., Holwerda, A. M., Baker, S. K., & Phillips, S. M. (2010) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01147.2009 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Sartorius, G., Spasevska, S., Idan, A., Turner, L., Forbes, E., Zamojska, A., Allan, C. A., Ly, L. P., Conway, A. J., McLachlan, R. I., et al. (2012) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04432.x · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Self-citationMazer, N. A. (2009) · Steroids · doi:10.1016/j.steroids.2009.01.008 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Predictive accuracy and sources of variability in calculated free testosterone estimates
Sartorius, G., Ly, L. P., Sikaris, K., McLachlan, R., & Handelsman, D. J. (2009) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1258/acb.2008.008171 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citationCalculation of Bioavailable and Free Testosterone in Men: A Comparison of 5 Published Algorithms
de Ronde, W., van der Schouw, Y. T., Pols, H. A., Gooren, L. J., Muller, M., Grobbee, D. E., & de Jong, F. H. (2006) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2005.063354 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Yeap, B. B., Chubb, S. A. P., Hyde, Z., Jamrozik, K., Hankey, G. J., Flicker, L., & Norman, P. E. (2009) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-09-0348 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Handelsman, D. J., Sikaris, K., & Ly, L. P. (2016) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1177/0004563215610589 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationCooper, L. A., Page, S. T., Amory, J. K., Anawalt, B. D., & Matsumoto, A. M. (2015) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/cen.12768 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Narinx, N., David, K., Walravens, J., Vermeersch, P., Claessens, F., Fiers, T., Lapauw, B., Antonio, L., & Vanderschueren, D. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04562-1 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Trost, L. W., & Mulhall, J. P. (2016) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.04.068 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Guadalupe‐Grau, A., Rodríguez‐García, L., Torres‐Peralta, R., Morales‐Álamo, D., Ponce‐González, J. G., Pérez‐Suarez, I., Santana, A., & Calbet, J. A. (2016) · European Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.1080/17461391.2015.1063701 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Birzniece, V., & Ho, K. K. Y. (2015) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-15-0426 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ly, L. P., & Handelsman, D. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Handelsman, David J
- ORCID
- Handelsman, David J
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 471-478
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2125097866
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Keywords
- free testosterone, total testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, bootstrap regression, model selection, Akaike information criterion
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Immunoassay, Male, Models, Biological, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Testosterone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review