The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relative Roles in Vivo of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol η, Pol ζ, Rev1 Protein and Pol32 in the Bypass and Mutation Induction of an Abasic Site, T-T (6-4) Photoadduct and T-T cis-syn Cyclobutane Dimer
Abstract
We have investigated the relative roles in vivo of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase η, DNA polymerase ζ, Rev1 protein, and the DNA polymerase δ subunit, Pol32, in the bypass of an abasic site, T-T (6-4) photoadduct and T-T cis-syn cyclobutane dimer, by transforming strains deleted for RAD30, REV3, REV1, or POL32 with duplex plasmids carrying one of these DNA lesions located within a 28-nucleotide single-stranded region. DNA polymerase η was found to be involved only rarely in the bypass of the T-T (6-4) photoadduct or the abasic sites in the sequence context used, although, as expected, it was solely responsible for the bypass of the T-T dimer. We argue that DNA polymerase ζ, rather than DNA polymerase δ as previously suggested, is responsible for insertion in bypass events other than those in which polymerase η performs this function. However, DNA polymerase δ is involved indirectly in mutagenesis, since the strain lacking its Pol32 subunit, known to be deficient in mutagenesis, shows as little bypass of the T-T (6-4) photoadduct or the abasic sites as those deficient in Pol ζ or Rev1. In contrast, bypass of the T-T dimer in the pol32Δ strain occurs at the wild-type frequency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biochemical Basis of DNA Replication Fidelity
Goodman, M. F., Creighton, S., Bloom, L. B., Petruska, J., & Kunkel, T. A. (1993) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409239309086792 · Cited by 446
Cited by
Eukaryotic Translesion Polymerases and Their Roles and Regulation in DNA Damage Tolerance
Waters, L. S., Minesinger, B. K., Wiltrout, M. E., D'Souza, S., Woodruff, R. V., & Walker, G. C. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00034-08 · Cited by 591
Ogi, T., Limsirichaikul, S., Overmeer, R. M., Volker, M., Takenaka, K., Cloney, R., Nakazawa, Y., Niimi, A., Miki, Y., Jaspers, N. G., et al. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.009 · Cited by 392
Translesion synthesis: Y-family polymerases and the polymerase switch
LEHMANN, A., NIIMI, A., OGI, T., BROWN, S., SABBIONEDA, S., WING, J., KANNOUCHE, P., & GREEN, C. (2007) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.003 · Cited by 389
Two-polymerase mechanisms dictate error-free and error-prone translesion DNA synthesis in mammals
Shachar, S., Ziv, O., Avkin, S., Adar, S., Wittschieben, J., Reißner, T., Chaney, S., Friedberg, E. C., Wang, Z., Carell, T., et al. (2009) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.281 · Cited by 284
Translesion DNA Synthesis and Mutagenesis in Eukaryotes
Sale, J. E. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012708 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbs, P. E. M., McDonald, J., Woodgate, R., & Lawrence, C. W.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 575-582
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2127144937
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relative Roles in Vivo of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol η, Pol ζ, Rev1 Protein and Pol32 in the Bypass and Mutation Induction of an Abasic Site, T-T (6-4) Photoadduct and T-T cis-syn Cyclobutane Dimer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.104.034611
- The paper
- Gibbs, P. E. M., McDonald, J., Woodgate, R., & Lawrence, C. W. (2005). The Relative Roles in Vivo of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol η, Pol ζ, Rev1 Protein and Pol32 in the Bypass and Mutation Induction of an Abasic Site, T-T (6-4) Photoadduct and T-T cis-syn Cyclobutane Dimer. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.034611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.