The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Exchangeability of Amino Acids in Proteins
Abstract
The comparative analysis of protein sequences depends crucially on measures of amino acid similarity or distance. Many such measures exist, yet it is not known how well these measures reflect the operational exchangeability of amino acids in proteins, since most are derived by methods that confound a variety of effects, including effects of mutation. In pursuit of a pure measure of exchangeability, we present (1) a compilation of data on the effects of 9671 amino acid exchanges engineered and assayed in a set of 12 proteins; (2) a statistical procedure to combine results from diverse assays of exchange effects; (3) a matrix of “experimental exchangeability” values EXij derived from applying this procedure to the compiled data; and (4) a set of three tests designed to evaluate the power of an exchangeability measure to (i) predict the effects of amino acid exchanges in the laboratory, (ii) account for the disease-causing potential of missense mutations in the human population, and (iii) model the probability of fixation of missense mutations in evolution. EX not only captures useful information on exchangeability while remaining free of other effects, but also outperforms all measures tested except for the best-performing alignment scoring matrix, which is comparable in performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Whelan, S., & Goldman, N. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003851 · Cited by 2,849
A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences.
(1994) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040153 · Cited by 1,960
Complete mutagenesis of the HIV-1 protease
Loeb, D. D., Swanstrom, R., Everitt, L., Manchester, M., Stamper, S. E., & Hutchison, C. A. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/340397a0 · Cited by 327
Cited by
Distribution of the strength of selection against amino acid replacements in human proteins.
Yampolsky, L. Y., Kondrashov, F. A., & Kondrashov, A. S. (2005) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi350 · Cited by 95
Self-citationThe neutral emergence of error minimized genetic codes superior to the standard genetic code
Massey, S. E. (2016) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.08.022 · Cited by 48
Massey, S. (2015) · Life · doi:10.3390/life5021301 · Cited by 38
“A solution is to use matrices designed to avoid this type of bias, such as the Exchangeability (EX) matrix, which is derived from the experimentally determined effects of amino acid substitutions on protein activity [57].”
MethodEffects of residue substitutions on the cellular abundance of proteins
Schulze, T. K., & Lindorff-Larsen, K. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.103721 · Cited by 3
Effects of residue substitutions on the cellular abundance of proteins
Schulze, T. K., & Lindorff-Larsen, K. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.103721.3 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Yampolsky, L. Y., & Stoltzfus, A.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-08-01
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1459-1472
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2063619185
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Exchangeability of Amino Acids in Proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.104.039107
- The paper
- Yampolsky, L. Y., & Stoltzfus, A. (2005). The Exchangeability of Amino Acids in Proteins. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.039107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.