The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting Selection in Population Trees: The Lewontin and Krakauer Test Extended
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Detecting genetic signatures of selection is of great interest for many research issues. Common approaches to separate selective from neutral processes focus on the variance of FST across loci, as does the original Lewontin and Krakauer (LK) test. Modern developments aim to minimize the false positive rate and to increase the power, by accounting for complex demographic structures. Another stimulating goal is to develop straightforward parametric and computationally tractable tests to deal with massive SNP data sets. Here, we propose an extension of the original LK statistic (TLK), named TF–LK, that uses a phylogenetic estimation of the population's kinship ($\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\mathrm{\mathcal{F}}\) \end{document}$) matrix, thus accounting for historical branching and heterogeneity of genetic drift. Using forward simulations of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) data under neutrality and selection, we confirm the relative robustness of the LK statistic (TLK) to complex demographic history but we show that TF–LK is more powerful in most cases. This new statistic outperforms also a multinomial-Dirichlet-based model [estimation with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)], when historical branching occurs. Overall, TF–LK detects 15–35% more selected SNPs than TLK for low type I errors (P < 0.001). Also, simulations show that TLK and TF–LK follow a chi-square distribution provided the ancestral allele frequencies are not too extreme, suggesting the possible use of the chi-square distribution for evaluating significance. The empirical distribution of TF–LK can be derived using simulations conditioned on the estimated $\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\mathrm{\mathcal{F}}\) \end{document}$ matrix. We apply this new test to pig breeds SNP data and pinpoint outliers using TF–LK, otherwise undetected using the less powerful TLK statistic. This new test represents one solution for compromise between advanced SNP genetic data acquisition and outlier analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
(1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · Cited by 59,715
Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics
Beaumont, M. A., Zhang, W., & Balding, D. J. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/162.4.2025 · Cited by 2,932
Foll, M., & Gaggiotti, O. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.108.092221 · Cited by 2,736
Generating samples under a Wright–Fisher neutral model of genetic variation
Hudson, R. R. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.337 · Cited by 2,364
ESTIMATION OF THE COANCESTRY COEFFICIENT: BASIS FOR A SHORT-TERM GENETIC DISTANCE
Reynolds, J., Weir, B. S., & Cockerham, C. C. (1983) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/105.3.767 · Cited by 1,786
Molecular Signatures of Natural Selection
Nielsen, R. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112420 · Cited by 1,641
Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure.
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0237 · Cited by 1,535
The power and promise of population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing
Luikart, G., England, P. R., Tallmon, D., Jordan, S., & Taberlet, P. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1226 · Cited by 1,365
Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods
Marjoram, P., Molitor, J., Plagnol, V., & Tavaré, S. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0306899100 · Cited by 1,199
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 2003, Arch. Zootecnia, 52, 207
- 1999, Hum. Genet., 105, 567
- 2009, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 104, 142, 10.1198/jasa.2009.0010 · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.0010
- 2003, Nat. Rev. Genet., 4, 981
- 1977, Theor. Popul. Biol., 11, 291, 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90013-2 · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(77)90013-2
- 2010, Genetics, 178, 1817
- 1987, Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 406
- 1992, J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol., 54, 211, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1992.tb01875.x · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1992.tb01875.x
- 1976, Genetics, 84, 399, 10.1093/genetics/84.2.399 · doi:10.1093/genetics/84.2.399
Cited by
Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data
Pickrell, J. K., & Pritchard, J. K. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002967 · Cited by 2,731
Finding the genomic basis of local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions
Hoban, S., Kelley, J. L., Lotterhos, K. E., Antolin, M. F., Bradburd, G., Lowry, D. B., Poss, M. L., Reed, L. K., Storfer, A., & Whitlock, M. C. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/688018 · Cited by 876
“…tree approach uses the data from many SNPs to estimate a tree of genetic divergence among populations (assuming no migration but accounting for shared ancestry of closely related populations) and then simulates data based on these trees to generate a null distribution (Bonhomme et al. 2010).”
Detecting Natural Selection in Genomic Data
Vitti, J. J., Grossman, S. R., & Sabeti, P. C. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133526 · Cited by 694
A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation
Berg, J. J., & Coop, G. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004412 · Cited by 487
Bouwman, A. C., Daetwyler, H. D., Chamberlain, A. J., Ponce, C. H., Sargolzaei, M., Schenkel, F. S., Sahana, G., Govignon-Gion, A., Boitard, S., Dolezal, M., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0056-5 · Cited by 401
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonhomme, M., Chevalet, C., Servin, B., Boitard, S., Abdallah, J., Blott, S., & SanCristobal, M.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-09-01
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 241-262
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118484872
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 3.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting Selection in Population Trees: The Lewontin and Krakauer Test Extended. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.104.117275
- The paper
- Bonhomme, M., Chevalet, C., Servin, B., Boitard, S., Abdallah, J., Blott, S., & SanCristobal, M. (2010). Detecting Selection in Population Trees: The Lewontin and Krakauer Test Extended. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.117275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.