Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detecting Selection in Population Trees: The Lewontin and Krakauer Test Extended

Open access
Bonhomme, M., Chevalet, C., Servin, B., Boitard, S., Abdallah, J., Blott, S., SanCristobal, M.·2010·Genetics

Abstract

Abstract Detecting genetic signatures of selection is of great interest for many research issues. Common approaches to separate selective from neutral processes focus on the variance of FST across loci, as does the original Lewontin and Krakauer (LK) test. Modern developments aim to minimize the false positive rate and to increase the power, by accounting for complex demographic structures. Another stimulating goal is to develop straightforward parametric and computationally tractable tests to deal with massive SNP data sets. Here, we propose an extension of the original LK statistic (TLK), named TF–LK, that uses a phylogenetic estimation of the population's kinship ($\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\mathrm{\mathcal{F}}\) \end{document}$) matrix, thus accounting for historical branching and heterogeneity of genetic drift. Using forward simulations of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) data under neutrality and selection, we confirm the relative robustness of the LK statistic (TLK) to complex demographic history but we show that TF–LK is more powerful in most cases. This new statistic outperforms also a multinomial-Dirichlet-based model [estimation with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)], when historical branching occurs. Overall, TF–LK detects 15–35% more selected SNPs than TLK for low type I errors (P < 0.001). Also, simulations show that TLK and TF–LK follow a chi-square distribution provided the ancestral allele frequencies are not too extreme, suggesting the possible use of the chi-square distribution for evaluating significance. The empirical distribution of TF–LK can be derived using simulations conditioned on the estimated $\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\mathrm{\mathcal{F}}\) \end{document}$ matrix. We apply this new test to pig breeds SNP data and pinpoint outliers using TF–LK, otherwise undetected using the less powerful TLK statistic. This new test represents one solution for compromise between advanced SNP genetic data acquisition and outlier analyses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.104.117275

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 2003, Arch. Zootecnia, 52, 207
  2. 1999, Hum. Genet., 105, 567
  3. 2009, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 104, 142, 10.1198/jasa.2009.0010 · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.0010
  4. 2003, Nat. Rev. Genet., 4, 981
  5. 1977, Theor. Popul. Biol., 11, 291, 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90013-2 · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(77)90013-2
  6. 2010, Genetics, 178, 1817
  7. 1987, Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 406
  8. 1992, J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol., 54, 211, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1992.tb01875.x · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1992.tb01875.x
  9. 1976, Genetics, 84, 399, 10.1093/genetics/84.2.399 · doi:10.1093/genetics/84.2.399

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Bonhomme, M., Chevalet, C., Servin, B., Boitard, S., Abdallah, J., Blott, S., & SanCristobal, M.
Venue
Genetics
Published
2010-09-01
Volume
186
Issue
1
Pages
241-262
ISSN
0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118484872
Cited by
285
References
35
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting Selection in Population Trees: The Lewontin and Krakauer Test Extended. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.104.117275
The paper
Bonhomme, M., Chevalet, C., Servin, B., Boitard, S., Abdallah, J., Blott, S., & SanCristobal, M. (2010). Detecting Selection in Population Trees: The Lewontin and Krakauer Test Extended. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.117275

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.