The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beneficial Mutation–Selection Balance and the Effect of Linkage on Positive Selection
Open accessAbstract
When beneficial mutations are rare, they accumulate by a series of selective sweeps. But when they are common, many beneficial mutations will occur before any can fix, so there will be many different mutant lineages in the population concurrently. In an asexual population, these different mutant lineages interfere and not all can fix simultaneously. In addition, further beneficial mutations can accumulate in mutant lineages while these are still a minority of the population. In this article, we analyze the dynamics of such multiple mutations and the interplay between multiple mutations and interference between clones. These result in substantial variation in fitness accumulating within a single asexual population. The amount of variation is determined by a balance between selection, which destroys variation, and beneficial mutations, which create more. The behavior depends in a subtle way on the population parameters: the population size, the beneficial mutation rate, and the distribution of the fitness increments of the potential beneficial mutations. The mutation–selection balance leads to a continually evolving population with a steady-state fitness variation. This variation increases logarithmically with both population size and mutation rate and sets the rate at which the population accumulates beneficial mutations, which thus also grows only logarithmically with population size and mutation rate. These results imply that mutator phenotypes are less effective in larger asexual populations. They also have consequences for the advantages (or disadvantages) of sex via the Fisher–Muller effect; these are discussed briefly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
McVean, G. A. T., & Charlesworth, B. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.929 · Cited by 336
Cited by
The Population Genetics of dN/dS
Kryazhimskiy, S., & Plotkin, J. B. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304 · Cited by 962
Genetic drift, selection and the evolution of the mutation rate
Lynch, M., Ackerman, M. S., Gout, J.-F., Long, H., Sung, W., Thomas, W. K., & Foster, P. L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.104 · Cited by 911
Quantifying the local adaptive landscape of a nascent bacterial community
Ascensao, J. A., Wetmore, K. M., Good, B. H., Arkin, A. P., & Hallatschek, O. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35677-5 · Cited by 447
The evolutionary dynamics and fitness landscape of clonal hematopoiesis
Watson, C. J., Papula, A. L., Poon, G. Y. P., Wong, W. H., Young, A. L., Druley, T. E., Fisher, D. S., & Blundell, J. R. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay9333 · Cited by 444
Self-citationThe population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent
Loewe, L., & Hill, W. G. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0317 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Desai, M. M., & Fisher, D. S.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1759-1798
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2152177323
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beneficial Mutation–Selection Balance and the Effect of Linkage on Positive Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.106.067678
- The paper
- Desai, M. M., & Fisher, D. S. (2007). Beneficial Mutation–Selection Balance and the Effect of Linkage on Positive Selection. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.067678
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.