The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach for Joint Inference of Population Structure and Inbreeding Rates From Multilocus Genotype Data
Open accessAbstract
Nonrandom mating induces correlations in allelic states within and among loci that can be exploited to understand the genetic structure of natural populations (Wright 1965). For many species, it is of considerable interest to quantify the contribution of two forms of nonrandom mating to patterns of standing genetic variation: inbreeding (mating among relatives) and population substructure (limited dispersal of gametes). Here, we extend the popular Bayesian clustering approach STRUCTURE (Pritchard et al. 2000) for simultaneous inference of inbreeding or selfing rates and population-of-origin classification using multilocus genetic markers. This is accomplished by eliminating the assumption of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium within clusters and, instead, calculating expected genotype frequencies on the basis of inbreeding or selfing rates. We demonstrate the need for such an extension by showing that selfing leads to spurious signals of population substructure using the standard STRUCTURE algorithm with a bias toward spurious signals of admixture. We gauge the performance of our method using extensive coalescent simulations and demonstrate that our approach can correct for this bias. We also apply our approach to understanding the population structure of the wild relative of domesticated rice, Oryza rufipogon, an important partially selfing grass species. Using a sample of n = 16 individuals sequenced at 111 random loci, we find strong evidence for existence of two subpopulations, which correlates well with geographic location of sampling, and estimate selfing rates for both groups that are consistent with estimates from experimental data (s ≈ 0.48–0.70).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kopelman, N. M., Mayzel, J., Jakobsson, M., Rosenberg, N. A., & Mayrose, I. (2015) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12387 · Cited by 3,246
Enhanced Bayesian modelling in BAPS software for learning genetic structures of populations
Corander, J., Marttinen, P., Sirén, J., & Tang, J. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-539 · Cited by 874
Genome-wide survey of SNP variation uncovers the genetic structure of cattle breeds
The Bovine HapMap Consortium, Gibbs, R. A., Taylor, J. F., Van Tassell, C. P., Barendse, W., Eversole, K. A., Gill, C. A., Green, R. D., Hamernik, D. L., Kappes, S. M., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1167936 · Cited by 868
Self-citationMosher, D. S., Quignon, P., Bustamante, C. D., Sutter, N. B., Mellersh, C. S., Parker, H. G., & Ostrander, E. A. (2007) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030079 · Cited by 826
Self-citationKlaedtke, S., Caproni, L., Klauck, J., De la Grandville, P., Dutartre, M., Stassart, P., Chable, V., Negri, V., & Raggi, L. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18030493 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, H., Williamson, S., & Bustamante, C. D.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1635-1651
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2106604417
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach for Joint Inference of Population Structure and Inbreeding Rates From Multilocus Genotype Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.107.072371
- The paper
- Gao, H., Williamson, S., & Bustamante, C. D. (2007). A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach for Joint Inference of Population Structure and Inbreeding Rates From Multilocus Genotype Data. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.072371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.