The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulating the Yield Impacts of Organ-Level Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Drought Response in Maize: A “Gene-to-Phenotype” Modeling Approach
Open accessAbstract
Under drought, substantial genotype–environment (G × E) interactions impede breeding progress for yield. Identifying genetic controls associated with yield response is confounded by poor genetic correlations across testing environments. Part of this problem is related to our inability to account for the interplay of genetic controls, physiological traits, and environmental conditions throughout the crop cycle. We propose a modeling approach to bridge this “gene-to-phenotype” gap. For maize under drought, we simulated the impact of quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling two key processes (leaf and silk elongation) that influence crop growth, water use, and grain yield. Substantial G × E interaction for yield was simulated for hypothetical recombinant inbred lines (RILs) across different seasonal patterns of drought. QTL that accelerated leaf elongation caused an increase in crop leaf area and yield in well-watered or preflowering water deficit conditions, but a reduction in yield under terminal stresses (as such “leafy” genotypes prematurely exhausted the water supply). The QTL impact on yield was substantially enhanced by including pleiotropic effects of these QTL on silk elongation and on consequent grain set. The simulations obtained illustrated the difficulty of interpreting the genetic control of yield for genotypes influenced only by the additive effects of QTL associated with leaf and silk growth. The results highlight the potential of integrative simulation modeling for gene-to-phenotype prediction and for exploiting G × E interactions for complex traits such as drought tolerance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In fact, such component trait QTL have been successfully used to parametrize CGMs for studying genotype dependent response to environmental conditions [28, 29, 73, 94, 95].”
From Integrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation (2015) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins of order; self organization and selection in evolution
Kauffman, S. A. (1994) · International Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0020-711x(94)90119-8 · Cited by 6,753
An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation
Keating, B. A., Carberry, P. S., Hammer, G. L., Probert, M. E., Robertson, M. J., Holzworth, D., Huth, N. I., Hargreaves, J. N. G., Meinke, H., Hochman, Z., et al. (2003) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00108-9 · Cited by 2,878
Self-citationAccounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments
Gilmour, A. R., Cullis, B. R., Verbyla, A. P., & Verbyla, A. P. (1997) · Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.2307/1400446 · Cited by 752
Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement
(1996) · doi:10.1079/9780851991085.0000 · Cited by 745
The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize
Bolaños, J., & Edmeades, G. O. (1996) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/0378-4290(96)00036-6 · Cited by 652
Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry
Campos, H., Cooper, M., Habben, J. E., Edmeades, G. O., & Schussler, J. R. (2004) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.003 · Cited by 646
Smith, A., Cullis, B., & Thompson, R. (2001) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01138.x · Cited by 566
Granier, C., Aguirrezábal, L. A. N., Chenu, K., Cookson, S. J., Dauzat, M., Hamard, P., Thioux, J.-J., Rolland, G., Bouchier-Combaud, S., Lebaudy, A., et al. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01609.x · Cited by 536
Self-citationKernel Number Determination in Maize
Andrade, F. H., Vega, C. R. C., Uhart, S. A., Cirilo, A. G., Cantarero, M. G., & Valentinuz, O. (1999) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183x0039000200026x · Cited by 465
Grain yields with limited water
Boyer, J. S. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erh219 · Cited by 438
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2003, Trends Plant Sci., 8, 1360
- 2007, J. Exp. Bot., 58, 339
Cited by
Sorted by citations
APSIM – evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation
Holzworth, D. P., Huth, N. I., deVoil, P. G., Zurcher, E. J., Herrmann, N. I., McLean, G., Chenu, K., van Oosterom, E. J., Snow, V., Murphy, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009 · Cited by 1,756
Self-citationClimate change impacts on crop yields
Rezaei, E. E., Webber, H. A., Asseng, S., Boote, K. J., Durand, J. L., Ewert, F. A., Martre, P., & MacCarthy, D. S. (2023) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-023-00491-0 · Cited by 907
Plant Phenomics, From Sensors to Knowledge
Tardieu, F., Cabrera‐Bosquet, L., Pridmore, T., & Bennett, M. J. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.055 · Cited by 666
Self-citationTardieu, F., Simonneau, T., & Muller, B. (2018) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040218 · Cited by 578
Self-citationTardieu, F. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err269 · Cited by 549
Self-citationGenetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat
Fleury, D., Jefferies, S. P., Kuchel, H., & Langridge, P. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq152 · Cited by 544
Wheat physiology: a review of recent developments
Fischer, R. A. (2011) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/cp10344 · Cited by 396
Accelerating crop genetic gains with genomic selection
Voss-Fels, K. P., Cooper, M., & Hayes, B. J. (2019) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-018-3270-8 · Cited by 381
Gaba, S., Lescourret, F., Boudsocq, S., Enjalbert, J., Hinsinger, P., Journet, E., Navas, M., Wéry, J., Louarn, G., Malézieux, É., et al. (2014) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-014-0272-z · Cited by 424
Adapting APSIM to model the physiology and genetics of complex adaptive traits in field crops
Hammer, G. L., van Oosterom, E., McLean, G., Chapman, S. C., Broad, I., Harland, P., & Muchow, R. C. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq095 · Cited by 367
Self-citationHigh‐throughput Phenotyping and Genomic Selection: The Frontiers of Crop Breeding Converge F
Cabrera‐Bosquet, L., Crossa, J. L., von Zitzewitz, J. W., Serret, M. D., & Araus, J. L. (2012) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01116.x · Cited by 329
Towards a multiscale crop modelling framework for climate change adaptation assessment
Peng, B., Guan, K., Tang, J., Ainsworth, E. A., Asseng, S., Bernacchi, C. J., Cooper, M., Delucia, E. H., Elliott, J. W., Ewert, F., et al. (2020) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-020-0625-3 · Cited by 322
Self-citationDissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants
Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2010) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.012 · Cited by 321
Self-citationContribution of Crop Models to Adaptation in Wheat.
Chenu, K., Porter, J., Martre, P., Basso, B., Chapman, S., Ewert, F., Bindi, M., & Asseng, S. (2017) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.02.003 · Cited by 262
Self-citationChenu, K., Cooper, M., Hammer, G. L., Mathews, K. L., Dreccer, M. F., & Chapman, S. C. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq459 · Cited by 298
Self-citationvan Eeuwijk, F. A., Bustos‐Korts, D., & Malosetti, M. (2016) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0375 · Cited by 323
Enhancing Genetic Gain through Genomic Selection: From Livestock to Plants
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Fu, J., Wang, H., Wang, J., Huang, C., Prasanna, B. M., Olsen, M. S., Wang, G., & Zhang, A. (2019) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2019.100005 · Cited by 318
Genotype × environment interaction QTL mapping in plants: lessons from Arabidopsis
El‐Soda, M., Malosetti, M., Zwaan, B. J., Koornneef, M., & Aarts, M. G. M. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2014.01.001 · Cited by 314
Prognosis for genetic improvement of yield potential and water-limited yield of major grain crops
Hall, A. J., & Richards, R. A. (2012) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.05.014 · Cited by 295
Zheng, B., Chenu, K., Dreccer, M. F., & Chapman, S. C. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02724.x · Cited by 289
Self-citationChenu, K., Deihimfard, R., & Chapman, S. C. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12192 · Cited by 298
Self-citationCharacterizing drought stress and trait influence on maize yield under current and future conditions
Harrison, M. T., Tardieu, F., Dong, Z., Messina, C. D., & Hammer, G. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12381 · Cited by 297
Self-citationCrop traits and production under drought
Vadez, V., Grondin, A., Chenu, K., Henry, A., Laplaze, L., Millet, E. J., & Carminati, A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-023-00514-w · Cited by 267
Self-citationIntegrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation
Technow, F., Messina, C. D., Totir, L. R., & Cooper, M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130855 · Cited by 265
Marguerit, E., BRENDEL, O., Lebon, É., van Leeuwen, C., & Ollat, N. (2012) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04059.x · Cited by 249
Messina, C. D., Podlich, D., Dong, Z., Samples, M., & Cooper, M. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq329 · Cited by 233
Messina, C. D., Technow, F., Tang, T., Totir, R., Gho, C., & Cooper, M. (2018) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2018.01.007 · Cited by 225
Agricultural production systems modelling and software: current status and future prospects
Holzworth, D. P., Snow, V., Janssen, S., Athanasiadis, I. N., Donatelli, M., Hoogenboom, G., White, J. W., & Thorburn, P. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.013 · Cited by 218
van Eeuwijk, F. A., Bustos-Korts, D., Millet, E. J., Boer, M. P., Kruijer, W., Thompson, A., Malosetti, M., Iwata, H., Quiroz, R., Kuppe, C., et al. (2019) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.06.018 · Cited by 217
“Crop growth models (CGMs) present a class of G2P models that integrate genetic and environmental variables in a natural way over time [53,61,127,128].”
BackgroundSelf-citationCooper, M., Technow, F., Messina, C., Gho, C., & Totir, L. R. (2016) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2015.08.0512 · Cited by 214
Lin, Y. (2015) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.10.011 · Cited by 217
Issues for cropping and agricultural science in the next 20 years
Fischer, R. A., & Connor, D. J. (2018) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.008 · Cited by 207
Sahebi, M., Hanafi, M. M., Rafii, M. Y., Mahmud, T. M. M., Azizi, P., Osman, M., Abiri, R., Taheri, S., Kalhori, N., Shabanimofrad, M., et al. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/3158474 · Cited by 203
Detection and use of QTL for complex traits in multiple environments
van Eeuwijk, F. A., Bink, M. C. A. M., Chenu, K., & Chapman, S. C. (2010) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2010.01.001 · Cited by 192
Self-citationCrop design for specific adaptation in variable dryland production environments
Hammer, G. L., McLean, G., Chapman, S., Zheng, B., Doherty, A., Harrison, M. T., van Oosterom, E., & Jordan, D. (2014) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp14088 · Cited by 179
Self-citationGenetic and Physiological Controls of Growth under Water Deficit
Tardieu, F., Parent, B., Caldeira, C. F., & Welcker, C. (2014) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.113.233353 · Cited by 190
Self-citationDrought Tolerance in Crop Plants
Xoconostle‐Cázares, B., Ramírez-Ortega, F. A., Flores-Ele, L., & Ruiz-Medra, R. (2010) · American Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.3923/ajpp.2010.241.256 · Cited by 178
Spectral Vegetation Indices to Track Senescence Dynamics in Diverse Wheat Germplasm
Anderegg, J., Yu, K., Aasen, H., Walter, A., Liebisch, F., & Hund, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01749 · Cited by 161
Zheng, B., Biddulph, B., Li, D., Kuchel, H., & Chapman, S. C. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ert209 · Cited by 140
Self-citationVadez, V., Deshpande, S., Kholová, J., Hammer, G., Borrell, A. K., Talwar, H. S., & Hash, C. T. (2011) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp11073 · Cited by 140
Self-citationLeaf greenness as a drought tolerance related trait in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
Rolando, J. L., Ramírez, D. A., Yactayo, W., Monneveux, P., & Quiroz, R. A. (2014) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.09.006 · Cited by 135
Novel crop science to improve yield and resource use efficiency in water-limited agriculture
Davies, W. J., Zhang, J., Yang, J., & Dodd, I. C. (2010) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859610001115 · Cited by 129
A multisite managed environment facility for targeted trait and germplasm phenotyping
Rebetzke, G. J., Chenu, K., Biddulph, B., Moeller, C., Deery, D. M., Rattey, A. R., Bennett, D., Barrett-Lennard, E. G., & Mayer, J. E. (2012) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12180 · Cited by 123
Self-citationModel-assisted phenotyping and ideotype design
Martre, P., Quilot‐Turion, B., Luquet, D., Memah, M.-M., Chenu, K., & Debaeke, P. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417104-6.00014-5 · Cited by 121
Self-citationParent, B., & Tardieu, F. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru223 · Cited by 127
Self-citationSequencing crop genomes: approaches and applications
Jackson, S. A., Iwata‐Otsubo, A., Lee, S., Schmutz, J., & Shoemaker, R. C. (2011) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03804.x · Cited by 115
Reflections on food security under water scarcity
Fereres, E., Orgaz, F., & Gonzalez-Dugo, V. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err165 · Cited by 113
Water: the most important ‘molecular’ component of water stress tolerance research
Vadez, V., Kholová, J., Zaman‐Allah, M., & Belko, N. (2013) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp13149 · Cited by 112
Matthews, R., Rivington, M., Muhammed, S. E., Newton, A. C., & Hallett, P. D. (2012) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2012.11.009 · Cited by 109
Biological reality and parsimony in crop models—why we need both in crop improvement!
Hammer, G., Messina, C., Wu, A., & Cooper, M. (2019) · in silico Plants · doi:10.1093/insilicoplants/diz010 · Cited by 108
Self-citationMalosetti, M., Bustos‐Korts, D., Boer, M. P., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2016) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2015.05.0311 · Cited by 118
Casadebaig, P., Zheng, B., Chapman, S. C., Huth, N. I., Faivre, R., & Chenu, K. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146385 · Cited by 112
Self-citationFunctional dynamics of the nitrogen balance of sorghum. II. Grain filling period
van Oosterom, E. J., Chapman, S. C., Borrell, A. K., Broad, I., & Hammer, G. (2009) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.019 · Cited by 105
Self-citationPlant and crop simulation models: powerful tools to link physiology, genetics, and phenomics
Muller, B., & Martre, P. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erz175 · Cited by 110
Controlling the speed and trajectory of evolution with counterdiabatic driving
Iram, S., Dolson, E. L., Chiel, J., Pelesko, J., Krishnan, N., Güngör, Ö., Kuznets-Speck, B., Deffner, S., İlker, E., Scott, J. G., et al. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0989-3 · Cited by 104
Characterizing the crop environment – nature, significance and applications
Chenu, K. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417104-6.00013-3 · Cited by 106
Self-citationModelling the effect of plant water use traits on yield and stay-green expression in sorghum
Kholová, J., Murugesan, T., Sivasakthi, K., Malayee, S., Baddam, R., Hammer, G., McLean, G., Deshpande, S., Hash, C. T., Craufurd, P., et al. (2014) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp13355 · Cited by 101
Self-citationImproving process-based crop models to better capture genotype×environment×management interactions
Wang, E., Brown, H., Rebetzke, G. J., Zhao, Z., Zheng, B., & Chapman, S. C. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erz092 · Cited by 95
Self-citationImproving crop yield potential: Underlying biological processes and future prospects
Burgess, A. J., Masclaux‐Daubresse, C., Strittmatter, G., Weber, A. P. M., Taylor, S. H., Harbinson, J., Yin, X., Long, S. P., Paul, M. J., Westhoff, P., et al. (2022) · Food and Energy Security · doi:10.1002/fes3.435 · Cited by 98
Grand challenges for the 21st century: what crop models can and can't (yet) do
Silva, . V., & Giller, K. E. (2020) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859621000150 · Cited by 103
Campos, G. D. L., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., Bogard, M., Gouache, D., & Crossa, J. L. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18480-y · Cited by 92
Aspinwall, M. J., Loik, M. E., de Dios, V. R., Tjoelker, M. G., Payton, P., & Tissue, D. T. (2014) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12424 · Cited by 91
Can We Harness “Enviromics” to Accelerate Crop Improvement by Integrating Breeding and Agronomy?
Cooper, M., & Messina, C. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.735143 · Cited by 94
Bogard, M., Ravel, C., Paux, E., Bordes, J., Balfourier, F., Chapman, S. C., Le Gouis, J., & Allard, V. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru328 · Cited by 87
Self-citationWelcker, C., Sadok, W., Dignat, G., Renault, M., Salvi, S., Charcosset, A., & Tardieu, F. (2011) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.111.176479 · Cited by 86
Self-citationChenu, K., van Oosterom, E. J., McLean, G., Deifel, K., Fletcher, A., Geetika, G., Tirfessa, A., Mace, E., Jordan, D. R., Sulman, R., et al. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ery059 · Cited by 85
Self-citationTurc, O., & Tardieu, F. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ery078 · Cited by 84
Self-citationGenetic and Genomic Approaches for Adaptation of Grapevine to Climate Change
Delrot, S., Grimplet, J., Carbonell‐Bejerano, P., Schwandner, A., Bert, P., Bavaresco, L., Costa, L. D., Gaspero, G. D., Duchêne, É., Hausmann, L., et al. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97946-5_7 · Cited by 82
Rebolledo, M. C., Dingkuhn, M., Courtois, B., Gibon, Y., Clément‐Vidal, A., Cruz, D. F., Duitama, J., Lorieux, M., & Luquet, D. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erv258 · Cited by 78
Potgieter, A. B., Zhao, Y., Zarco‐Tejada, P. J., Chenu, K., Zhang, Y., Porker, K. D., Biddulph, B., Dang, Y. P., Neale, T., Roosta, F., et al. (2021) · in silico Plants · doi:10.1093/insilicoplants/diab017 · Cited by 78
Self-citationDissecting the rootstock control of scion transpiration using model-assisted analyses in grapevine
Peccoux, A., Loveys, B. R., Zhu, J., Gambetta, G. A., Delrot, S., Vivin, P., Schultz, H. R., Ollat, N., & Dai, Z. (2017) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpx153 · Cited by 77
Water and thermal regimes for field pea in Australia and their implications for breeding
Sadras, V. O., Lake, L., Chenu, K., McMurray, L. S., & Leonforte, A. (2012) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/cp11321 · Cited by 76
Self-citationSimulation Modeling: Applications in Cropping Systems
Asseng, S., Zhu, Y., Basso, B., Wilson, T., & Cammarano, D. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52512-3.00233-3 · Cited by 75
Combining Crop Growth Modeling and Statistical Genetic Modeling to Evaluate Phenotyping Strategies
Bustos‐Korts, D., Boer, M. P., Malosetti, M., Chapman, S. C., Chenu, K., Zheng, B., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01491 · Cited by 76
Self-citationHeinemann, A. B., Perez, C. B., Ramírez-Villegas, J., Arango-Londoño, D., Bonilla-Findji, O., Medeiros, J. C., & Jarvis, A. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erv126 · Cited by 71
Role of Modelling in International Crop Research: Overview and Some Case Studies
Reynolds, M. P., Kropff, M. J., Crossa, J. L., Koo, J., Kruseman, G., Milan, A. M., Rutkoski, J. E., Schulthess, U., Singh, B., Sonder, K., et al. (2018) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy8120291 · Cited by 71
Cooper, M., Powell, O. M., Voss‐Fels, K. P., Messina, C. D., Gho, C., Podlich, D., Technow, F., Chapman, S. C., Beveridge, C. A., Ortíz-Barrientos, D., et al. (2020) · in silico Plants · doi:10.1093/insilicoplants/diaa016 · Cited by 78
Self-citationEnhanced biomass prediction by assimilating satellite data into a crop growth model
Machwitz, M., Giustarini, L., Bossung, C., Frantz, D., Schlerf, M., Lilienthal, H., Wandera, L., Matgen, P., Hoffmann, L., & Udelhoven, T. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.010 · Cited by 72
Identifying traits for genotypic adaptation using crop models
Ramírez-Villegas, J., Watson, J., & Challinor, A. J. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erv014 · Cited by 74
Rodrigues, P. C., Malosetti, M., Gauch, H. G., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2014) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.07.0462 · Cited by 70
Perrier, L., Rouan, L., Jaffuel, S., Clément‐Vidal, A., Roques, S., Soutiras, A., Baptiste, C., Bastianelli, D., Fabre, D., Dubois, C., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01516 · Cited by 68
Beres, B. L., Hatfield, J. L., Kirkegaard, J. A., Eigenbrode, S. D., Pan, W. L., Lollato, R. P., Hunt, J. R., Strydhorst, S., Porker, K., Lyon, D., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00828 · Cited by 66
Ramirez‐Villegas, J., Molero Milan, A., Alexandrov, N., Asseng, S., Challinor, A. J., Crossa, J., van Eeuwijk, F., Ghanem, M. E., Grenier, C., Heinemann, A. B., et al. (2020) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20048 · Cited by 65
Zheng, B., Chenu, K., & Chapman, S. C. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13118 · Cited by 64
Self-citationRegulation of tillering in sorghum: genotypic effects
Kim, H. K., Luquet, D., van Oosterom, E. J., Dingkuhn, M., & Hammer, G. (2010) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcq080 · Cited by 70
Self-citationEngineering solutions for food-energy-water systems: it is more than engineering
Wolfe, M. L., Ting, K. C., Scott, N. R., Sharpley, A. N., Jones, J. W., & Verma, L. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-016-0363-z · Cited by 67
Can we harness digital technologies and physiology to hasten genetic gain in US maize breeding?
Diepenbrock, C., Tang, T., Jines, M. P., Technow, F., Lira, S., Podlich, D., Cooper, M., & Messina, C. D. (2021) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1093/plphys/kiab527 · Cited by 63
Bustos‐Korts, D., Malosetti, M., Chapman, S. C., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20562-5_3 · Cited by 66
Self-citationGu, J., Yin, X., Zhang, C., Wang, H., & Struik, P. C. (2014) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcu127 · Cited by 59
Modelling the size and composition of fruit, grain and seed by process‐based simulation models
Martre, P., Bertin, N., Salon, C., & Génard, M. M. (2011) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03747.x · Cited by 58
Determinants of barley grain yield in a wide range of Mediterranean environments
Francia, E., Tondelli, A., Rizza, F., Badeck, F., Nicosia, O. L. D., Akar, T., Grando, S., Al‐Yassin, A., Benbelkacem, A., Thomas, W. T. B., et al. (2010) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.010 · Cited by 58
Cooper, M., Messina, C. D., Tang, T., Gho, C., Powell, O. M., Podlich, D. W., Technow, F., & Hammer, G. L. (2022) · Plant Breeding Reviews · doi:10.1002/9781119874157.ch8 · Cited by 56
Self-citationDebaeke, P., Casadebaig, P., & Langlade, N. (2021) · OCL · doi:10.1051/ocl/2021016 · Cited by 56
Projected impact of future climate on water-stress patterns across the Australian wheatbelt
Watson, J., Zheng, B., Chapman, S. C., & Chenu, K. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx368 · Cited by 55
Self-citationYasin, M., Ahmad, A., Khaliq, T., Rahman, M. H. U., Niaz, S., Gaiser, T., Ghafoor, I., Hassan, H. S. U., Qasim, M., & Hoogenboom, G. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17050-z · Cited by 53
Improving drought tolerance in maize: Tools and techniques
McMillen, M. S., Mahama, A. A., Sibiya, J., Lübberstedt, T., & Suza, W. P. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.1001001 · Cited by 50
Quilot‐Turion, B., Memah, M.-M., Kadrani, A., Hilgert, N., Génard, M. M., & Lescourret, F. (2011) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2011.11.008 · Cited by 50
Tardieu, F., & Parent, B. (2016) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12822 · Cited by 50
Self-citationComputer Simulation in Plant Breeding
Li, X., Zhu, C., Wang, J., & Yu, J. (2012) · Advances in agronomy · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394277-7.00006-3 · Cited by 48
Dixit, P. N., Tellería, R., Al-Khatib, A., & Allouzi, S. F. (2017) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.270 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Chenu, K., Chapman, S. C., Tardieu, F., McLean, G., Welcker, C., & Hammer, G. L.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 759, Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, 34060 Montpellier, France
- Department of Primary Industries (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Chenu, Karine
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1507-1523
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- PMC
- PMC2787435
- OpenAlex
- W2158656445
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Genetics (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- maize, drought tolerance, quantitative trait loci, gene-environment interaction, leaf elongation, grain yield, recombinant inbred lines, pleiotropy, grain set, water consumption, drought simulation
- MeSH terms
- Breeding, Zea mays, Environment, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Rain, Stress, Physiological, Volatilization, Water, Plant Leaves, Quantitative Trait Loci, Droughts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review