The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulating the Yield Impacts of Organ-Level Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Drought Response in Maize: A “Gene-to-Phenotype” Modeling Approach
Open accessAbstract
Under drought, substantial genotype–environment (G × E) interactions impede breeding progress for yield. Identifying genetic controls associated with yield response is confounded by poor genetic correlations across testing environments. Part of this problem is related to our inability to account for the interplay of genetic controls, physiological traits, and environmental conditions throughout the crop cycle. We propose a modeling approach to bridge this “gene-to-phenotype” gap. For maize under drought, we simulated the impact of quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling two key processes (leaf and silk elongation) that influence crop growth, water use, and grain yield. Substantial G × E interaction for yield was simulated for hypothetical recombinant inbred lines (RILs) across different seasonal patterns of drought. QTL that accelerated leaf elongation caused an increase in crop leaf area and yield in well-watered or preflowering water deficit conditions, but a reduction in yield under terminal stresses (as such “leafy” genotypes prematurely exhausted the water supply). The QTL impact on yield was substantially enhanced by including pleiotropic effects of these QTL on silk elongation and on consequent grain set. The simulations obtained illustrated the difficulty of interpreting the genetic control of yield for genotypes influenced only by the additive effects of QTL associated with leaf and silk growth. The results highlight the potential of integrative simulation modeling for gene-to-phenotype prediction and for exploiting G × E interactions for complex traits such as drought tolerance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In fact, such component trait QTL have been successfully used to parametrize CGMs for studying genotype dependent response to environmental conditions [28, 29, 73, 94, 95].”
From Integrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation (2015) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins of order; self organization and selection in evolution
Kauffman, S. A. (1994) · International Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0020-711x(94)90119-8 · Cited by 6,753
An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation
Keating, B. A., Carberry, P. S., Hammer, G. L., Probert, M. E., Robertson, M. J., Holzworth, D., Huth, N. I., Hargreaves, J. N. G., Meinke, H., Hochman, Z., et al. (2003) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00108-9 · Cited by 2,878
Self-citationAccounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments
Gilmour, A. R., Cullis, B. R., Verbyla, A. P., & Verbyla, A. P. (1997) · Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.2307/1400446 · Cited by 752
Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement
(1996) · doi:10.1079/9780851991085.0000 · Cited by 745
The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize
Bolaños, J., & Edmeades, G. O. (1996) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/0378-4290(96)00036-6 · Cited by 652
Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry
Campos, H., Cooper, M., Habben, J. E., Edmeades, G. O., & Schussler, J. R. (2004) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.003 · Cited by 646
Smith, A., Cullis, B., & Thompson, R. (2001) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01138.x · Cited by 566
Granier, C., Aguirrezábal, L. A. N., Chenu, K., Cookson, S. J., Dauzat, M., Hamard, P., Thioux, J.-J., Rolland, G., Bouchier-Combaud, S., Lebaudy, A., et al. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01609.x · Cited by 536
Self-citationKernel Number Determination in Maize
Andrade, F. H., Vega, C. R. C., Uhart, S. A., Cirilo, A. G., Cantarero, M. G., & Valentinuz, O. (1999) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183x0039000200026x · Cited by 465
Grain yields with limited water
Boyer, J. S. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erh219 · Cited by 438
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2003, Trends Plant Sci., 8, 1360
- 2007, J. Exp. Bot., 58, 339
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 234
Heliaphen, an Outdoor High-Throughput Phenotyping Platform for Genetic Studies and Crop Modeling
Gosseau, F., Blanchet, N., Varès, D., Burger, P., Campergue, D., Colombet, C., Gody, L., Liévin, J.-F., Mangin, B., Tison, G., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01908 · Cited by 53
Bhat, J. A., Feng, X., Mir, Z. A., Raina, A., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2023) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.13969 · Cited by 48
Chapuis, R., Delluc, C., Debeuf, R., Tardieu, F., & Welcker, C. (2012) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2011.12.006 · Cited by 47
Self-citationFramework to guide modeling single and multiple abiotic stresses in arable crops
Webber, H., Rezaei, E., Ryo, M., & Ewert, F. (2022) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2022.108179 · Cited by 36
Hammer, G., Messina, C. D., van Oosterom, E. J., Chapman, S. C., Singh, V., Borrell, A. K., Jordan, D., & Cooper, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20562-5_7 · Cited by 47
Self-citationInterdisciplinary strategies to enable data-driven plant breeding in a changing climate
Kusmec, A., Zheng, Z., Archontoulis, S. V., Ganapathysubramanian, B., Hu, G., Wang, L., Yu, J., & Schnable, P. S. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.005 · Cited by 47
Lamsal, A., Welch, S. M., White, J. W., Thorp, K. R., & Bello, N. M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195841 · Cited by 45
Upland rice breeding led to increased drought sensitivity in Brazil
Heinemann, A. B., Ramírez-Villegas, J., Rebolledo, M. C., Costa‐Neto, G., & de Castro, A. P. (2018) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.11.009 · Cited by 45
Multiscale Phenotyping and Decision Strategies in Breeding for Resistance
Willocquet, L., Savary, S., & Yuen, J. E. (2017) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.01.009 · Cited by 44
Incorporating realistic trait physiology into crop growth models to support genetic improvement
Boote, K. J., Jones, J. W., & Hoogenboom, G. (2021) · in silico Plants · doi:10.1093/insilicoplants/diab002 · Cited by 44
Building bridges: an integrated strategy for sustainable food production throughout the value chain
Albajes, R., Cantero‐Martínez, C., Capell, T., Christou, P., Farre, A., Galceran, J., López-Gatius, F., Marı́n, S., Martín‐Belloso, O., Motilva, M., et al. (2013) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-013-9915-z · Cited by 45
Hill, K., Porco, S., Lobet, G., Zappala, S., Mooney, S. J., Draye, X., & Bennett, M. J. (2013) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.113.227215 · Cited by 42
Distinct controls of leaf widening and elongation by light and evaporative demand in maize
Lacube, S., Fournier, C., Palaffre, C., Millet, E. J., Tardieu, F., & Parent, B. (2017) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.13005 · Cited by 42
Self-citationAdla, S., Bruckmaier, F., Arias-Rodriguez, L. F., Tripathi, S., Pande, S., & Disse, M. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120248 · Cited by 40
Lecœur, J., Poiré, R., Christophe, A., Pallas, B., Casadebaig, P., Debaeke, P., Vear, F., & Guilioni, L. (2011) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp09189 · Cited by 40
Yang, L., Jiang, T., Fountain, J. C., Scully, B. T., Lee, R., Kemerait, R. C., Chen, S., & Guo, B. Z. (2014) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms151018892 · Cited by 39
Transcriptome Profiling of Leaf Elongation Zone under Drought in Contrasting Rice Cultivars
Cal, A. J., Liu, D., Mauleon, R., Hsing, Y.-I. C., & Serraj, R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054537 · Cited by 38
Characterisation of chickpea cropping systems in Australia for major abiotic production constraints
Chauhan, Y. S., Allard, S., Williams, R., Williams, B., Mundree, S., Chenu, K., & Rachaputi, R. C. N. (2017) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.008 · Cited by 38
Self-citationEstimation of leaf area for large scale phenotyping and modeling of rose genotypes
Gao, M., van der Heijden, G. W. A. M., Vos, J., Eveleens, B., & Marcelis, L. F. M. (2012) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2012.02.014 · Cited by 36
Hwang, C., Correll, M. J., Gezan, S. A., Zhang, L., Bhakta, M., Vallejos, C. E., Boote, K. J., Michelangeli, J. A. C., & Jones, J. W. (2016) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2016.10.010 · Cited by 36
Luquet, D., Soulié, J.-C., Rebolledo, M. C., Rouan, L., Clément‐Vidal, A., & Dingkuhn, M. (2012) · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science · doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2012.00527.x · Cited by 36
Ly, D., Chenu, K., Gauffreteau, A., Rincent, R., Huet, S., Gouache, D., Martre, P., Bordes, J., & Charmet, G. (2017) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2017.09.024 · Cited by 32
Self-citationRadanielson, A. M., Gaydon, D. S., Khan, M. M. R., Chaki, A. K., Rahman, M. A., Angeles, O. R., Li, T., & Ismail, A. M. (2018) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.08.020 · Cited by 31
Bogard, M., Biddulph, B., Zheng, B., Hayden, M., Kuchel, H., Mullan, D., Allard, V., Gouis, J. L., & Chapman, S. C. (2020) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20113 · Cited by 29
Self-citationOijen, M. A. V., & Høglind, M. (2015) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-015-1562-5 · Cited by 29
Pleban, J. R., Guadagno, C. R., Mackay, D. S., Weinig, C., & Ewers, B. E. (2020) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.19.00375 · Cited by 28
Why work and discuss the basic principles of plant modelling 50 years after the first plant models?
Tardieu, F. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq135 · Cited by 28
Self-citationLentil Variation in Phenology and Yield Evaluated with a Model
Ghanem, M. E., Marrou, H., Soltani, A., Kumar, S., & Sinclair, T. R. (2015) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj15.0061 · Cited by 28
Pallas, B., Clément‐Vidal, A., Rebolledo, M. C., Soulié, J.-C., & Luquet, D. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00437 · Cited by 27
Tardieu, F., Granato, Í. S. C., van Oosterom, E. J., Parent, B., & Hammer, G. (2020) · in silico Plants · doi:10.1093/insilicoplants/diaa011 · Cited by 28
Self-citationOrman-Ligeza, B., Civava, R., de Dorlodot, S., & Draye, X. (2014) · Soil biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54276-3_3 · Cited by 27
Modelling QTL-Trait-Crop Relationships: Past Experiences and Future Prospects
Yin, X., Struik, P. C., Gu, J., & Wang, H. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20562-5_9 · Cited by 27
Gouesnard, B., Zanetto, A., & Welcker, C. (2015) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-015-1624-8 · Cited by 26
Self-citationCarcedo, A. J. P., Mayor, L., Demarco, P., Morris, G. P., Lingenfelser, J., Messina, C. D., & Ciampitti, I. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.768610 · Cited by 29
Prudent, M., Dai, Z., Génard, M., Bertin, N., Causse, M., & Vivin, P. (2013) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.10.023 · Cited by 24
Michelangeli, J. A. C., Bhakta, M., Gezan, S. A., Boote, K. J., & Vallejos, C. E. (2013) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12114 · Cited by 24
Genotype by Environment Interaction and Adaptation
Romagosa, I., Borràs-Gelonch, G., Slafer, G. A., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_199 · Cited by 23
Growth and yield estimation of banana through mathematical modelling: a systematic review
Jayasinghe, S. L., Ranawana, C. J. K., Liyanage, I. C., & Kaliyadasa, P. E. (2022) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859622000259 · Cited by 22
Multi-scale modelling to synergise Plant Systems Biology and Crop Science
Chew, Y. H., Seaton, D. D., & Millar, A. J. (2016) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.012 · Cited by 23
Toward a general framework for AI-enabled prediction in crop improvement
Messina, C. D., García‐Abadillo, J., Powell, O. M., Tomura, S., Zare, A., Ganapathysubramanian, B., & Cooper, M. (2025) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-025-04928-6 · Cited by 21
Genotype by Environment Interaction and Adaptation
Bustos‐Korts, D., Romagosa, I., Borràs-Gelonch, G., Casas, A. M., Slafer, G. A., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_199-3 · Cited by 20
Jighly, A., Weeks, A., Christy, B., O’Leary, G. J., Kant, S., Aggarwal, R., Hessel, D., Forrest, K., Technow, F., Tibbits, J. F. G., et al. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erad162 · Cited by 19
Bustos‐Korts, D., Boer, M. P., Chenu, K., Zheng, B., Chapman, S. C., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2021) · in silico Plants · doi:10.1093/insilicoplants/diab018 · Cited by 20
Self-citationChimonyo, V. G. P., Chibarabada, T. P., Choruma, D. J., Kunz, R. P., Walker, S., Massawe, F. J., Modi, A. T., & Mabhaudhi, T. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142113931 · Cited by 18
APSIM’s origins and the forces shaping its first 30 years of evolution: A review and reflections
Keating, B. A. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00959-3 · Cited by 18
Optimization of Allelic Combinations Controlling Parameters of a Peach Quality Model
Quilot‐Turion, B., Génard, M., Valsesia, P., & Memah, M.-M. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01873 · Cited by 18
Rodrigues, P. C. (2018) · Biometrical Letters · doi:10.2478/bile-2018-0009 · Cited by 18
Khan, M. S., Struik, P. C., PUTTEN, P. E. L. V. D., Jansen, H. J., van Eck, H. J., van Eeuwijk, F. A., & Yin, X. (2019) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107581 · Cited by 18
Perez, R. P. A., Pallas, B., Moguédec, G. L., Rey, H., Griffon, S., Caliman, J., Costes, E., & Dauzat, J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erw203 · Cited by 17
Powell, O. M., Voss‐Fels, K. P., Jordan, D. R., Hammer, G., & Cooper, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.663565 · Cited by 18
Self-citationModelling the dynamics and phenotypic consequences of tiller outgrowth and cessation in sorghum
Hammer, G., McLean, G., Kholová, J., & van Oosterom, E. J. (2023) · in silico Plants · doi:10.1093/insilicoplants/diad019 · Cited by 17
Self-citationPredicting Tillering of Diverse Sorghum Germplasm across Environments
Alam, M. M., van Oosterom, E. J., Cruickshank, A., Jordan, D. R., & Hammer, G. (2016) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2016.04.0262 · Cited by 17
Self-citationLarue, F., Fumey, D., Rouan, L., Soulié, J.-C., Roques, S., Beurier, G., & Luquet, D. (2019) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcz038 · Cited by 17
Dixit, P. N., & Tellería, R. (2015) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.001 · Cited by 17
Designing crops for new challenges
Tardieu, F., & Hammer, G. (2012) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2012.05.006 · Cited by 17
Self-citationRelative yield decomposition: A method for understanding the behaviour of complex crop models
Talbot, G., Roux, S., Graves, A. R., Dupraz, C., Marrou, H., & Wéry, J. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.017 · Cited by 16
Lacube, S., Manceau, L., Welcker, C., Millet, E. J., Gouesnard, B., Palaffre, C., Ribaut, J., Hammer, G., Parent, B., & Tardieu, F. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa278 · Cited by 16
Self-citationBogard, M., Hourcade, D., Piquemal, B., Gouache, D., Deswartes, J.-C., Throude, M., & Cohan, J. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa477 · Cited by 16
Vivin, P., Lebon, É., Dai, Z., Duchêne, É., Marguerit, E., Atauri, I. G. D. C., Zhu, J., Simonneau, T., van Leeuwen, C., Delrot, S., et al. (2017) · OENO One · doi:10.20870/oeno-one.2016.0.0.1588 · Cited by 16
Cooper, M., Tomura, S., Wilkinson, M. J., Powell, O. M., & Messina, C. D. (2025) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-025-04960-6 · Cited by 16
Tailoring parameter distributions to specific germplasm: impact on crop model-based ideotyping
Paleari, L., Movedi, E., Vesely, F. M., & Confalonieri, R. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-54810-x · Cited by 15
Trait-based model development to support breeding programs. A case study for salt tolerance and rice
Paleari, L., Movedi, E., & Confalonieri, R. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04022-y · Cited by 14
Tisné, S., Denis, M., Domonhédo, H., Pallas, B., Cazemajor, M., Tranbarger, T. J., & Morcillo, F. (2020) · Plant-Environment Interactions · doi:10.1002/pei3.10011 · Cited by 14
Crop Models as Tools for Agroclimatology
Webber, H. A., Hoffmann, M. P., & Rezaei, E. E. (2018) · Agronomy monograph/Agronomy · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr60.2016.0025 · Cited by 14
Genotype by Environment Interaction and Adaptation
Romagosa, I., Borràs-Gelonch, G., Slafer, G. A., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_199 · Cited by 14
A Generic Model to Simulate Air-Borne Diseases as a Function of Crop Architecture
Casadebaig, P., Quesnel, G., Langlais, M. R., & Faivre, R. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049406 · Cited by 13
Genotype by Environment Interaction and Adaptation
Bustos‐Korts, D., Romagosa, I., Borràs-Gelonch, G., Casas, A. M., Slafer, G. A., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8621-7_199 · Cited by 13
Singels, A. (2013) · Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology · doi:10.1002/9781118771280.ch20 · Cited by 11
Yield dissection models to improve yield: a case study in tomato
Tsutsumi-Morita, Y., Heuvelink, E., Khaleghi, S., Bustos‐Korts, D., Marcelis, L. F. M., Vermeer, K. M. C. A., van Dijk, H., Millenaar, F. F., van Voorn, G. A. K., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2021) · in silico Plants · doi:10.1093/insilicoplants/diab012 · Cited by 11
Current data and modeling bottlenecks for predicting crop yields in the United Kingdom
Corcoran, E. M., Afshar, M. H., Curceac, S., Lashkari, A., Raza, M. M., Ahnert, S. E., Mead, A., & Morris, R. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1023169 · Cited by 11
Combining genome-wide prediction and a phenology model to simulate heading date in spring barley
Uptmoor, R., Pillen, K., & Matschegewski, C. (2016) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.006 · Cited by 11
Upcycling rice yield trial data using a weather-driven crop growth model
Shimono, H., Abe, A., Kim, C. H., Sato, C., & Iwata, H. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05145-x · Cited by 10
Crop phenotyping for physiological breeding in grain crops: A case study for maize
Otegui, M. E., Borrás, L., & Maddonni, G. Á. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417104-6.00015-7 · Cited by 10
Baker, R. L., Leong, W. F., Welch, S., & Weinig, C. (2018) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.117.300350 · Cited by 11
Reuning, G., Bauerle, W. L., Mullen, J. L., & McKay, J. (2014) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12429 · Cited by 9
Brunel‐Muguet, S., Aubertot, J., & Dürr, C. (2011) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcr071 · Cited by 11
Luquet, D., Rebolledo, C., Rouan, L., Soulié, J.-C., & Dingkuhn, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20562-5_5 · Cited by 9
Thapa, R., Kunze, K. H., Hansen, J. L., Pierce, C., Moore, V. M., Ray, I. M., Wickes-Do, L., Morales, N., Sabadin, F., Santantonio, N., et al. (2024) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkae200 · Cited by 8
Improvement of Yield per se in Sugarcane
Gouy, M., Nibouche, S., Hoarau, J.-Y., & Costet, L. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118728482.ch13 · Cited by 8
Li, Y., Tao, F., Hao, Y., Tong, J., Xiao, Y., Zhang, H., He, Z., & Reynolds, M. P. (2022) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.14518 · Cited by 7
Rodrigues, P. C., Heuvelink, E., Marcelis, L. F. M., Chapman, S. C., & van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2021) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20476 · Cited by 7
Self-citationKholová, J., Adam, M., Diancoumba, M., Hammer, G., Hajjarpoor, A., Chenu, K., & Jarolímek, J. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-8249-3_8 · Cited by 7
Self-citationAhmadi, N., Bertrand, B., & Glaszmann, J.-C. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7984-6_4 · Cited by 7
QTL Modelling: An Adaptation Option in Spring Wheat for Drought Stress
Aslam, M. U., Shehzad, A., Ahmed, M., Iqbal, M., Asim, M., & Aslam, M. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32059-5_6 · Cited by 6
Using Crop Modelling to Improve Chickpea Adaptation in Variable Environments
Chauhan, Y. S., Chenu, K., & Williams, R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64500-7_8 · Cited by 6
Self-citationThe Relationship between Metaheuristics Stopping Criteria and Performances
Sidi, M.-M. O., Quilot‐Turion, B., Kadrani, A., Génard, M., & Lescourret, F. (2014) · International Journal of Applied Metaheuristic Computing · doi:10.4018/ijamc.2014070104 · Cited by 6
Crop Systems Biology: Where Are We and Where to Go?
Yin, X., & Struik, P. C. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20562-5_10 · Cited by 6
Boote, K. J., Vallejos, C. E., Jones, J. W., & Correll, M. J. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20562-5_8 · Cited by 6
Breeding wheat for drought adaptation: Development of selection tools for root architectural traits
Richard, C. (2017) · The University of Queensland · doi:10.14264/uql.2017.1055 · Cited by 6
GS4PB: An R Shiny application to facilitate a genomic selection pipeline for plant breeding
Ramasubramanian, V., Wartha, C. A., Singh, L., Vitale, P., Ru, S., Bhusal, S. J., & Lorenz, A. J. (2025) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.70150 · Cited by 5
Lenk, S., Dieleman, J. A., Lefèbvre, V., Heuvelink, E., Magán, J. J., Palloix, A., van Eeuwijk, F. A., & Barócsi, A. (2020) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.32615/ps.2020.016 · Cited by 5
Use of transcriptomic data to inform biophysical models via Bayesian networks
Guadagno, C. R., Millar, D., Lai, R., Mackay, D. S., Pleban, J. R., McClung, C. R., Weinig, C., Wang, D., & Ewers, B. E. (2020) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109086 · Cited by 5
Gu, J. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12010215 · Cited by 5
Vadez, V., & Kholová, J. (2013) · Sécheresse · doi:10.1684/sec.2013.0399 · Cited by 5
Alimi, N. A. (2016) · doi:10.18174/390205 · Cited by 5
Understanding rates of genetic gain in sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] in the United States
Singh, J., Merchant, A., Mayor, L., Mbaye, M., Gho, C., Cooper, M., & Messina, C. D. (2025) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.70122 · Cited by 4
Dissecting durum wheat time to anthesis into physiological traits using a QTL-based model
Martre, P., Motzo, R., Mastrangelo, A. M., Marone, D., Vita, P. D., & Giunta, F. (2024) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2024.127379 · Cited by 4
How to dissect complex traits and how to choose suitable mapping resources for system genetics?
van Eeuwijk, F. A. (2015) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2015.04.035 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Chenu, K., Chapman, S. C., Tardieu, F., McLean, G., Welcker, C., & Hammer, G. L.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 759, Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, 34060 Montpellier, France
- Department of Primary Industries (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Chenu, Karine
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1507-1523
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- PMC
- PMC2787435
- OpenAlex
- W2158656445
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Genetics (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- maize, drought tolerance, quantitative trait loci, gene-environment interaction, leaf elongation, grain yield, recombinant inbred lines, pleiotropy, grain set, water consumption, drought simulation
- MeSH terms
- Breeding, Zea mays, Environment, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Rain, Stress, Physiological, Volatilization, Water, Plant Leaves, Quantitative Trait Loci, Droughts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review