The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification of Inbreeding Due to Distant Ancestors and Its Detection Using Dense Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Data
Open accessAbstract
Inbreeding depression, which refers to reduced fitness among offspring of related parents, has traditionally been studied using pedigrees. In practice, pedigree information is difficult to obtain, potentially unreliable, and rarely assessed for inbreeding arising from common ancestors who lived more than a few generations ago. Recently, there has been excitement about using SNP data to estimate inbreeding (F) arising from distant common ancestors in apparently “outbred” populations. Statistical power to detect inbreeding depression using SNP data depends on the actual variation in inbreeding in a population, the accuracy of detecting that with marker data, the effect size, and the sample size. No one has yet investigated what variation in F is expected in SNP data as a function of population size, and it is unclear which estimate of F is optimal for detecting inbreeding depression. In the present study, we use theory, simulated genetic data, and real genetic data to find the optimal estimate of F, to quantify the likely variation in F in populations of various sizes, and to estimate the power to detect inbreeding depression. We find that F estimated from runs of homozygosity (Froh), which reflects shared ancestry of genetic haplotypes, retains variation in even large populations (e.g., SD = 0.5% when Ne = 10,000) and is likely to be the most powerful method of detecting inbreeding effects from among several alternative estimates of F. However, large samples (e.g., 12,000–65,000) will be required to detect inbreeding depression for likely effect sizes, and so studies using Froh to date have probably been underpowered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089
Are Rare Variants Responsible for Susceptibility to Complex Diseases?
Pritchard, J. K. (2001) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/321272 · Cited by 1,197
Identification of loci associated with schizophrenia by genome-wide association and follow-up
Molecular Genetics of Schizophrenia Collaboration, O'Donovan, M. C., Craddock, N., Norton, N., Williams, H., Peirce, T., Moskvina, V., Nikolov, I., Hamshere, M., Carroll, L., et al. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.201 · Cited by 1,070
Fenner, J. N. (2005) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20188 · Cited by 508
Recent human effective population size estimated from linkage disequilibrium
Tenesa, A., Navarro, P., Hayes, B. J., Duffy, D. L., Clarke, G. M., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6023607 · Cited by 438
Self-citationQuantification of homozygosity in consanguineous individuals with autosomal recessive disease
Woods, C. G., Cox, J., Springell, K., Hampshire, D. J., Mohamed, M. D., McKibbin, M., Stern, R., Raymond, F. L., Sandford, R., Malik Sharif, S., et al. (2006) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/503875 · Cited by 262
The impact of consanguinity on neonatal and infant health.
Bittles, A. H., & Black, M. L. (2010) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.08.003 · Cited by 132
Cited by
Runs of homozygosity: windows into population history and trait architecture
Ceballos, F. C., Joshi, P. K., Clark, D. W., Ramsay, M., & Wilson, J. F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.109 · Cited by 1,006
Understanding Inbreeding Depression, Purging, and Genetic Rescue
Hedrick, P. W., & Garcia-Dorado, A. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.005 · Cited by 668
Bjelland, D. W., Weigel, K. A., Vukasinovic, N., & Nkrumah, J. D. (2013) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2012-6435 · Cited by 300
Joint estimates of heterozygosity and runs of homozygosity for modern and ancient samples
Renaud, G., Hanghøj, K., Korneliussen, T. S., Willerslev, E., & Orlando, L. (2019) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.119.302057 · Cited by 101
Mooney, J. A., Yohannes, A., & Lohmueller, K. E. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.11.16.385443 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Keller, M. C., Visscher, P. M., & Goddard, M. E.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-09-01
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 237-249
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2167651190
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 8.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of Inbreeding Due to Distant Ancestors and Its Detection Using Dense Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.111.130922
- The paper
- Keller, M. C., Visscher, P. M., & Goddard, M. E. (2011). Quantification of Inbreeding Due to Distant Ancestors and Its Detection Using Dense Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Data. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.130922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.