Cited by 56Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionEvolution and Genetic DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

How Biochemical Constraints of Cellular Growth Shape Evolutionary Adaptations in Metabolism

Open access
Berkhout, Jan, Bosdriesz, Evert, Nikerel, Emrah, Molenaar, Douwe, de Ridder, Dick, Teusink, Bas, Bruggeman, Frank J·2013·Genetics

Abstract

Evolutionary adaptations in metabolic networks are fundamental to evolution of microbial growth. Studies on unneeded-protein synthesis indicate reductions in fitness upon nonfunctional protein synthesis, showing that cell growth is limited by constraints acting on cellular protein content. Here, we present a theory for optimal metabolic enzyme activity when cells are selected for maximal growth rate given such growth-limiting biochemical constraints. We show how optimal enzyme levels can be understood to result from an enzyme benefit minus cost optimization. The constraints we consider originate from different biochemical aspects of microbial growth, such as competition for limiting amounts of ribosomes or RNA polymerases, or limitations in available energy. Enzyme benefit is related to its kinetics and its importance for fitness, while enzyme cost expresses to what extent resource consumption reduces fitness through constraint-induced reductions of other enzyme levels. A metabolic fitness landscape is introduced to define the fitness potential of an enzyme. This concept is related to the selection coefficient of the enzyme and can be expressed in terms of its fitness benefit and cost.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.113.150631

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-replicating models and whole-cell models are either mostly qualitative in nature or require an excessive number of parameters that are not currently available.

    “The latter two approaches either are mostly qualitative in nature or require an excessive number of parameters that are not currently available.”
  • The protein-limitation explanation for overflow metabolism has been shown with different approaches in a self-replicator model, Escherichia coli, cancer cells, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    “This has been shown with different approaches in a self‐replicator model (Molenaar et al, 2009; Berkhout et al, 2013), E. coli (Vazquez et al, 2008; O'Brien et al, 2013; Basan et al, 2015; Peebo et al, 2015), cancer cells (Shlomi et al, 2011; Vazquez & Oltvai, 2011), and S. cerevisiae (Van Hoek & Merks, 2012; Nilsson & Nielsen, 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Heinrich, R., and S. Schuster, 1998 The modelling of metabolic systems. Structure Control Optimality. Biosystems 47(1-2): 61- 77.
  2. Klipp, E., and R. Heinrich, 1999 Competition for enzymes in met- abolic pathways: implications for optimal distributions of en- zyme concentrations and for the distribution of flux control. Biosystems 54(1-2): 1-14.
  3. C Giersch. Control analysis of metabolic networks. 1. Homogeneous functions and the summation theorems for control coefficients. Eur. J. Biochem., 174(3):509-513, 1988.
  4. R Heinrich and E Klipp. Control analysis of unbranched enzymatic chains in states of maximal activity. J Theor Biol, 182(3):243-252, 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berkhout, J., Bosdriesz, E., Nikerel, E., Molenaar, D., de Ridder, D., Teusink, B., & Bruggeman, F. J.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Netherlands Bioinformatics Centre (NL)
  • Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation , 2600 GA, Delft, The Netherlands
  • Systems Bioinformatics , The Centre for Integrative Bioinformatics VU, VU University, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Bruggeman, Frank J
Venue
Genetics
Published
2013-06-01
Volume
194
Issue
2
Pages
505-512
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2122530127
Cited by
56
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (837.000.001)
  • Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
growth rate maximization, protein synthesis, energy limitation, fitness landscape, microbial growth, selection coefficients, metabolic networks
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Bacteria, Energy Metabolism, Enzymes, Models, Genetic, Ribosomes, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, Selection, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Evolution, Molecular, Cell Growth Processes, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Genetic Fitness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review