Cited by 766Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein

Dekel, Erez, Alon, Uri·2005·Nature

Abstract

Different proteins have different expression levels. It is unclear to what extent these expression levels are optimized to their environment. Evolutionary theories suggest that protein expression levels maximize fitness, but the fitness as a function of protein level has seldom been directly measured. To address this, we studied the lac system of Escherichia coli, which allows the cell to use the sugar lactose for growth. We experimentally measured the growth burden due to production and maintenance of the Lac proteins (cost), as well as the growth advantage (benefit) conferred by the Lac proteins when lactose is present. The fitness function, given by the difference between the benefit and the cost, predicts that for each lactose environment there exists an optimal Lac expression level that maximizes growth rate. We then performed serial dilution evolution experiments at different lactose concentrations. In a few hundred generations, cells evolved to reach the predicted optimal expression levels. Thus, protein expression from the lac operon seems to be a solution of a cost-benefit optimization problem, and can be rapidly tuned by evolution to function optimally in new environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature03842

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During ALE, clonal interference, bet hedging, genetic hitchhiking and fluctuating growth environments can lead to significant population heterogeneity.

    “Stable phenotypes will accumulate rapidly, although clonal interference [42], bet hedging [43,60], genetic hitchhiking [61] and fluctuating growth environments can lead to significant population heterogeneity [22,62,63].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dekel, E., & Alon, U.
Affiliations
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Corresponding author
Alon, Uri
Venue
Nature
Published
2005-07-28
Volume
436
Issue
7050
Pages
588-592
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2068872007
Cited by
766
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 46
FWCI
16.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Israel Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
protein abundance, lac operon, Escherichia coli, lactose metabolism, cost-benefit optimization, fitness maximization, gene expression evolution, growth rate
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Cell Division, Costs and Cost Analysis, Escherichia coli, Biological Evolution, Lac Operon, Lactose, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Escherichia coli Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review