Cited by 32Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVestibular and auditory disorders

The effect of orthostatic training in the prevention of vasovagal syncope and its influencing factors

Open access
Zeng, Hui, Ge, Kanyi, Zhang, Weilun, Wang, Guang, Guo, Lijun·2008·International Heart Journal

Abstract

Recently orthostatic training has been proposed as an effective treatment for vasovagal syncope, even though some patients may relapse. This study was undertaken to assess the effect of orthostatic training on patients with vasovagal syncope and its influencing factors. The study group comprised 125 consecutive patients (51 males and 74 females), aged 40 +/- 19 years, with a history of syncope and a positive head-up tilt test. They were randomized into an orthostatic training group (64 patients) and a no treatment group (controls, 61 patients). The training programme consisted of daily 30-minute sessions of upright standing against a vertical wall 6 days a week for at least 4 weeks. After one year of follow-up, 45 (72.6%) of 62 orthostatic trained patients reported no syncopal recurrence, while only 22 of 61 controls (36.1%, P < 0.05) reported the same. Furthermore, in the training group, the patients with recurrence were older, and the number of syncopal spells in the preceding year was less than in the patients with no recurrence in the same group. Orthostatic training is an effective therapy for the prevention of vasovagal syncope. This kind of therapy was of greater benefit to patients who were younger or experienced frequent spells of syncope.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1536/ihj.49.707

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Guo Lifen. Tilt training: New method to treat vasovagal syncope. Chinese Journal of Pacing and Cardiac Elec- trical Physiology 2006; 6: 530-1.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, H., Ge, K., Zhang, W., Wang, G., & Guo, L.
Affiliations
Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
Venue
International Heart Journal
Published
2008
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
707-712
ISSN
  • 1349-2365 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-3299
OpenAlex
W1972619801
Cited by
32
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
orthostatic training, vasovagal syncope, syncope prevention, head-up tilt, syncope recurrence, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Physical Education and Training, Tilt-Table Test, Syncope, Vasovagal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review