Cited by 407Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Dual-Chamber Pacing in the Treatment of Neurally Mediated Tilt-Positive Cardioinhibitory Syncope: Pacemaker Versus No Therapy: A Multicenter Randomized Study

Open access
Sutton, Richard, Brignole, Michele, Menozzi, Carlo, Raviele, Antonio, Alboni, Paolo, Giani, Paolo, Moya, Angel·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —This study was performed to compare implantation of a DDI pacemaker with rate hysteresis with no implant in respect to syncopal recurrences in patients with severe cardioinhibitory tilt-positive neurally mediated syncope. Methods and Results —Forty-two patients from 18 European centers were randomized to receive a DDI pacemaker programmed to 80 bpm with hysteresis of 45 bpm (19 patients) or no pacemaker (23 patients). Inclusion criteria were ≥3 syncopes over the last 2 years and a positive cardioinhibitory (Vasovagal Syncope International Study types 2A and 2B) response to tilt testing. The median number of previous syncopal episodes was 6; asystolic response to tilt testing was present in 36 patients (86%) (mean asystole, 13.9±10.2 seconds). All patients were followed up for a minimum of 1.0 years and a maximum of 6.7 years (mean, 3.7±2.2). One patient (5%) in the pacemaker arm experienced recurrence of syncope compared with 14 patients (61%) in the no-pacemaker arm ( P =0.0006). In the no-pacemaker arm, the median time to first syncopal recurrence was 5 months, with a rate of 0.44 per year. On repeated tilt testing performed within 15 days after enrollment, positive responses were observed in 59% of patients with pacemakers and in 61% of patients without pacemakers ( P =NS). Conclusions —In a limited, select group of patients with tilt-positive cardioinhibitory syncope, DDI pacing with hysteresis reduced the likelihood of syncope. The benefit of the therapy was maintained over the long term. Even in untreated patients, the syncopal recurrence burden was low. A negative result of tilt testing was not a useful means to evaluate therapy efficacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.3.294

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Earlier observational, open-label, and single-blind pacing studies were uniformly positive, but two subsequent double-blind studies in adults were negative.

    “Although earlier observational, open-label, and single-blind studies have been uniformly positive, the results of 2 subsequent double-blind studies in adults were negative.133–138”

    From 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope (2015) · cites this paper as [134]

    The Comparison With the North American Vasovagal Pacemaker Study section says this study and an earlier randomized study found favorable results, and that neither was blinded. The Study Limitations section also confirms that this trial was unblinded. Our copy does not establish that observational and single-blind studies were uniformly positive or report the two subsequent negative double-blind studies. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]15. Is dual-chamber pacing efficacious in treatment of neurally mediated tilt positive cardioinhibitory syncope? Pacemaker vs no therapy: a multi- center randomized study. Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol. 1993;3: 169 -172.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sutton, R., Brignole, M., Menozzi, C., Raviele, A., Alboni, P., Giani, P., & Moya, A.
Affiliations
  • Royal Brompton Hospital (GB)
  • From the Departments of Cardiology of Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK (R.S.); Ospedali Riuniti, Lavagna, Italy (M.B.); Ospedale S Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy (C.M.); Ospedale Umberto I, Mestre, Italy (A.R.); Ospedale Civile, Cento, Italy (P.A.); Ospedale Bolognini, Seriate, Italy (P.G.); and Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (A.M.).
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-07-18
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
294-299
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2146164209
Cited by
407
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
25.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
St. Jude Medical
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
DDD pacing, cardioinhibitory syncope, neurally mediated syncope, vasovagal syncope, syncope recurrence, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, asystole, tilt table test, pacemaker therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Tilt-Table Test, Syncope, Vasovagal, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review