The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Views of Participatory Design
Open accessAbstract
Professor Henry Sanoff is an internationally respected scholar who has been studying, publishing, and working with participatory design for more than forty years.His books and articles appear in several languages, and he has taught and served as a consultant all over the world.This article discusses the historical background of participatory design, its role in a democracy and in building community, and the different types of participation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Traditionally, supporting mutual understanding between different stakeholders has been one of the key missions of participatory processes (Sanoff, 2011).”
From Designing learning technology collaboratively: analysis of a chatbot co-design (2023) · cites this paper as Sanoff, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
de Tocqueville, A., Mansfield, H. C., & Winthrop, D. (2000) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118011690.ch12 · Cited by 6,287
(2008) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412953948.n339 · Cited by 3,237
Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology
Rappaport, J. (1987) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00919275 · Cited by 2,679
Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets
Kretzman, J. P., & McKnight, J. (1993) · Cited by 2,146
Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge
Chung, K. H., & Ouchi, W. G. (1982) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257316 · Cited by 1,696
Public deliberation: pluralism, complexity, and democracy
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-5341 · Cited by 1,544
ADVOCACY AND PLURALISM IN PLANNING
Davidoff, P. (1965) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366508978187 · Cited by 1,471
Finding Common Ground: The Importance of Place Attachment to Community Participation and Planning
Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. D. (2006) · Journal of Planning Literature · doi:10.1177/0885412205286160 · Cited by 1,354
Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge
Ouchi, W. G. (1981) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/0007-6813(81)90031-8 · Cited by 1,216
(2005) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · Cited by 1,064
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Casrson, L. 2003. Building Sustainable Democracies. Paper presented at "Now We Are People Conference", University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
- Rosener, J. 1978. Matching Method to Purpose: The Challenges of Planning Citizen Participation Activities. In S. Langton (ed.) Citizen Participation in America. New York: Lexington Books, New York.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Green Space on Violent Crime in Urban Environments: An Evidence Synthesis
Shepley, M. M., Sachs, N. A., Sadatsafavi, H., Fournier, C., & Peditto, K. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16245119 · Cited by 205
Stakeholders’ Expectations in Urban Renewal Projects in China: A Key Step towards Sustainability
Zhuang, T., Qian, Q. K., Visscher, H. J., & Elsinga, M. G. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9091640 · Cited by 103
An introduction to radical participatory design: decolonising participatory design processes
Udoewa, V. (2022) · Design Science · doi:10.1017/dsj.2022.24 · Cited by 77
“Specifically, in western design practices of design, technology, and innovation companies, PD processes have increasingly become popular in the late twentieth century to today (Sanoff 2011; Hartson & Pyla 2012; Hess & Pipek 2012).”
BackgroundHow Do I matter? A Review of the Participatory Design Practice with Less Privileged Participants
Galleguillos, M. L. R., & Coşkun, A. (2020) · Participatory Design Conference · doi:10.1145/3385010.3385018 · Cited by 53
Designing learning technology collaboratively: analysis of a chatbot co-design
Durall Gazulla, E., Martins, L., & Fernández-Ferrer, M. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11162-w · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanoff, H.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sanoff, Henry
- ORCID
- Sanoff, Henry
- Venue
- Focus
- Publisher
- Robert E. Kennedy Library, Cal Poly
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1549-3776 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096124464
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Focus The Journal of Planning Practice and Education (publishedVersion)
- DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Local Governance and Planning
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
- Keywords
- participatory design, democracy, community building, types of participation, community planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
