The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do We Recover from Vacation? Meta‐analysis of Vacation Effects on Health and Well‐being
Open accessAbstract
Do We Recover from Vacation? Meta‐analysis of Vacation Effects on Health and Wellbeing: Jessica de B loom, et al. Department of Work & Organizational Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands Objectives: The aim of this meta‐analysis is to investigate to what extent vacation has positive effects on health and well‐being, how long such effects endure after work resumption, and how specific vacation activities and experiences affect these relationships. Methods: Based on a systematic literature search (PsycInfo, Medline) and methodological exclusion criteria, in a stepwise approach, 7 studies were selected and reviewed. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated i) for every outcome variable within every study, ii) for every study by averaging the effect sizes per study, and iii) for homogeneous categories of outcome variables (exhaustion, health complaints, life satisfaction). Results: The results suggest that vacation has positive effects on health and well‐being (small effect, d=+0.43), but that these effects soon fade out after work resumption (small effect, d=–0.38). Our research further demonstrated that vacation activities and experiences have hardly been studied. Therefore, their contribution to vacation effect and fade out remains unclear. Discussion: Progress in future vacation research will depend on strong research designs that incorporate repeated measurements pre‐, inter‐ and post‐vacation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Allostasis: A New Paradigm to Explain Arousal Pathology
Sterling, P., & Eyer, J. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13537700 · Cited by 1,450
van der Hulst, M. (2003) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.720 · Cited by 614
Brosschot, J. F., Van Dijk, E., & Thayer, J. F. (2007) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.07.016 · Cited by 474
Cited by
Advances in recovery research: What have we learned? What should be done next?
Sonnentag, S., Venz, L., & Casper, A. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000079 · Cited by 587
Self-citationHealth and Wellness Benefits of Travel Experiences: A Literature Review
Chen, C.-C., & Petrick, J. F. (2013) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287513496477 · Cited by 369
Vacationers Happier, but Most not Happier After a Holiday
Nawijn, J., Marchand, M. A., Veenhoven, R., & Vingerhoets, A. J. (2010) · Applied Research in Quality of Life · doi:10.1007/s11482-009-9091-9 · Cited by 257
Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Geurts, S. A. E., & Taris, T. W. (2009) · Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being · doi:10.1108/s1479-3555(2009)0000007006 · Cited by 233
Self-citationAssessing the perceived restorative qualities of vacation destinations
Lehto, X. Y. (2013) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287512461567 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- de Bloom, J., Kompier, M., Geurts, S., de Weerth, C., Taris, T., & Sonnentag, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-25
- ISSN
- 1341-9145 (ISSN-L)
- 1348-9585
- OpenAlex
- W2101113204
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do We Recover from Vacation? Meta‐analysis of Vacation Effects on Health and Well‐being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1539/joh.k8004
- The paper
- de Bloom, J., Kompier, M., Geurts, S., de Weerth, C., Taris, T., & Sonnentag, S. (2009). Do We Recover from Vacation? Meta‐analysis of Vacation Effects on Health and Well‐being. Journal of Occupational Health. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.k8004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.