Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 329

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Amplitude-integrated EEG Classification and Interpretation in Preterm and Term Infants

Hellström-Westas, L., Rosén, I., de Vries, L.S., Greisen, G.·2006·NeoReviews

Abstract

After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Understand the amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) method and its utility and limitations. 2. Classify and interpret typical aEEG background patterns. 3. Identify epileptic seizure activity in the aEEG. 4. Describe features in the aEEG recording that are associated with prognosis. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a method for continuous monitoring of brain function that is used increasingly in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The method is based on filtered and compressed EEG that enables evaluation of long-term changes and trends in electrocortical background activity by relatively simple pattern recognition. The cerebral function monitor (CFM) was created by Prior and Maynard in the 1960s for use in adult intensive care. Prior and Maynard aimed for a brain monitoring system that had the following features: simplicity, reasonable cost, reliability, direct information about neuronal function, noninvasiveness and wide applicability, quantification and output, automatic operation, and flexibility. (1) The method was applied to newborns in the late 1970s and early 1980s. (2)(3)(4) The original CFM concept has been developed, and several new machines are now available, all including the aEEG trend recording with simultaneous display of the raw EEG. We and others have chosen to call the method aEEG to distinguish it from a special monitor. Published studies on neonatal aEEG include both clinical and experimental investigations. (5) The finding that the aEEG is suitable for very early prediction of outcome after perinatal asphyxia has resulted in more widespread use of the method, not least since abnormal aEEG readings were an inclusion criterion in one of the recently published hypothermia studies. (6) For new users of aEEG, the potential of this method is usually striking when clinical aEEG monitoring reveals abnormal brain activity that would otherwise pass unrecognized, such as subclinical seizure activity or transient …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/neo.7-2-e76

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 329

Metadata

Authors
Hellström-Westas, L., Rosén, I., de Vries, L. S., & Greisen, G.
Venue
NeoReviews
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
e76-e87
ISSN
1526-9906 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147968075
Cited by
329
References
1
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amplitude-integrated EEG Classification and Interpretation in Preterm and Term Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/neo.7-2-e76
The paper
Hellström-Westas, L., Rosén, I., de Vries, L. S., & Greisen, G. (2006). Amplitude-integrated EEG Classification and Interpretation in Preterm and Term Infants. NeoReviews. https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.7-2-e76

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.