Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Discrepancy Between Maturation of Visual-Evoked Potentials and Cognitive Outcome at Five Years in Very Preterm Infants With and Without Hemodynamic Signs of Fetal Brain-Sparing

Scherjon, Sicco, Briët, Judy, Oosting, Hans, Kok, Joke·2000·Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective.: After intrauterine growth restriction we found at the age of 6 months an acceleration of neurophysiologic maturation. However, at later ages impaired cognitive outcome has been reported. Therefore, we investigated in children with and without fetal hemodynamic adaptation to intrauterine growth restriction whether the accelerated neurophysiologic maturation in infancy might be associated with impaired cognitive outcome at preschool age. Design.: At 5 years of age cognitive function was assessed using the Revision of the Amsterdam Children's Intelligence Test in 73 preterm infants (26–33 weeks) who were prospectively followed from the antenatal period up to the age of 5 years. Maternal educational level was used as a background variable to estimate the confounding effects of socioeconomic status on cognitive function. Fetal Doppler studies were performed and the umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI) divided by the middle cerebral artery PI ratio (U/C ratio) was calculated. A U/C ratio >0.725 was considered as an indication of fetal cerebral hemodynamic adaptation to a compromised placental perfusion, ie, fetal brain-sparing. Visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded at 6 months and 1 year of age. In addition, data on neurologic status at 3 years were available. Results.: Mean IQ score was significantly lower for children born with a raised U/C ratio (87 ± 16) compared with children with a normal U/C ratio (96 ± 17). VEP latencies decreased significantly in infants with a normal U/C ratio, whereas no decrease was found in infants with a raised U/C ratio. Variables contributing significantly to the variance of cognitive function were: U/C group, VEP latency maturation, level of maternal education, and neurodevelopmental outcome at 3 years. The linear regression model explained 33% of the variance in cognitive function. Conclusions.: Both being born with a raised U/C ratio and an acceleration of VEP latencies are negatively associated with cognitive outcome at 5 years of age. Fetal brain-sparing, although a seemingly beneficial adaptive mechanism for intact neurologic survival, is, however, later associated with a poorer cognitive outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.105.2.385

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Scherjon, S., Briët, J., Oosting, H., & Kok, J.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
385-391
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2005823312
Cited by
188
References
0
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Discrepancy Between Maturation of Visual-Evoked Potentials and Cognitive Outcome at Five Years in Very Preterm Infants With and Without Hemodynamic Signs of Fetal Brain-Sparing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.105.2.385
The paper
Scherjon, S., Briët, J., Oosting, H., & Kok, J. (2000). The Discrepancy Between Maturation of Visual-Evoked Potentials and Cognitive Outcome at Five Years in Very Preterm Infants With and Without Hemodynamic Signs of Fetal Brain-Sparing. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.105.2.385

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.