Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neonatal Sepsis Workups in Infants ≥2000 Grams at Birth: A Population-Based Study

Escobar, Gabriel J., Li, De-kun, Armstrong, Mary Anne, Gardner, Marla N., Folck, Bruce F., Verdi, Joan E., Xiong, Blong, Bergen, Randy, for the Neonatal Infection Study Group·2000·Pediatrics

Abstract

Background.: Few data are available on the outcome of neonatal sepsis evaluations in an era when intrapartum antibiotic therapy is common. Methods.: We identified all newborns weighing ≥2000 g at birth who were ever evaluated for suspected bacterial infection at 6 Kaiser Permanente hospitals between October 1995 and November 1996, reviewed their records and laboratory data, and tracked them to 1 week after discharge. We analyzed the relationship between key predictors and the presence of neonatal bacterial infection. Results.: Among 18 299 newborns ≥2000 g without major congenital anomalies, 2785 (15.2%) were evaluated for sepsis with a complete blood count and/or blood culture. A total of 62 (2.2%) met criteria for proven, probable, or possible bacterial infection: 22 (.8%) had positive cultures and 40 (1.4%) had clinical evidence of bacterial infection. We tracked all but 10 infants (.4%) to 7 days postdischarge. There were 67 rehospitalizations (2.4%; 2 for group B streptococcus bacteremia). Among 1568 infants who did not receive intrapartum antibiotics, initial asymptomatic status was associated with decreased risk of infection (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: .26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .11–.63), while chorioamnionitis (AOR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.15–5.00), low absolute neutrophil count (AOR: 2.84; 95% CI: 1.50–5.38), and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (AOR: 2.23; 95% CI: 1.18–4.21) were associated with increased risk. Results were similar among 1217 infants who were treated, except that maternal chorioamnionitis was not significantly associated with neonatal infection. Conclusions.: The risk of bacterial infection in asymptomatic newborns is low. Evidence-based observation and treatment protocols could be defined based on a limited set of predictors: maternal fever, chorioamnionitis, initial neonatal examination, and absolute neutrophil count. Many missed opportunities for treating mothers and infants exist.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.106.2.256

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Escobar, G. J., Li, D.-K., Armstrong, M. A., Gardner, M. N., Folck, B. F., Verdi, J. E., Xiong, B., Bergen, R., & for the Neonatal Infection Study Group
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2000-08-01
Volume
106
Issue
2
Pages
256-263
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W1981428052
Cited by
245
References
0
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neonatal Sepsis Workups in Infants ≥2000 Grams at Birth: A Population-Based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.106.2.256
The paper
Escobar, G. J., Li, D.-K., Armstrong, M. A., Gardner, M. N., Folck, B. F., Verdi, J. E., Xiong, B., Bergen, R., & for the Neonatal Infection Study Group. (2000). Neonatal Sepsis Workups in Infants ≥2000 Grams at Birth: A Population-Based Study. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.2.256

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.