The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fluconazole for Prophylaxis Against Candidal Rectal Colonization in the Very Low Birth Weight Infant
Abstract
Background.: Candidal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the very low birth weight (VLBW) infant. Current intervention focuses on treatment once candidal septicemia is either suspected or diagnosed. Studies have suggested that colonization with candidal species is an important risk factor for subsequent infection. Objective.: To determine whether prophylactic fluconazole for the first 28 days of life results in a decreased incidence of candidal colonization in the VLBW infant. Research Design.: Prospective, randomized, controlled, intention-to-treat design comparing prophylaxis with fluconazole versus placebo for the first 28 days of life. Setting.: A tertiary level intensive care nursery in a major teaching hospital in Charleston, South Carolina. Patients.: One hundred three infants with a birth weight of <1500 g, either inborn or outborn, who were admitted to the intensive care nursery between January 1998 and February 1999. Methods.: Infants were enrolled within 72 hours of life with rectal cultures performed on the day of randomization (DOR), as well as day of life (DOL) 7, 14, and 28. Those infants with a birth weight of <1250 g had additional cultures on DOL 35, 49, and 56. Cultures were plated on selective media for isolation of candidal organisms. Infants were randomized to receive either fluconazole (6 mg/kg) or placebo on the DOR. Subsequent doses were given every 72 hours until DOL 7 and then every 24 hours until DOL 28. Medication was given either intravenously or by feeding tube once the infant had been gavage feeding for a 48-hour period without feeding intolerance. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels were obtained on DOR and DOL 7, 14, and 28 to assess for fluconazole toxicity. The minimal inhibitory concentration to fluconazole was determined for all positive cultures to assess the development of resistance. Results.: The infants who received fluconazole (n = 53) and placebo (n = 50) had no statistical difference in the major risk factors known to increase the chances of candidal septicemia in the VLBW infant. Rectal colonization by candidal species was detected in 8 of the 53 fluconazole-treated patients (15.1%) and in 23 of the 50 infants treated with placebo (46%). Fluconazole significantly reduced rectal colonization from DOL 14 through DOL 56 in all infants with a birth weight of <1250 g, and from DOL 14 through DOL 56 in all infants with a birth weight of 1250 to 1500 g. Alanine aminotransferase levels were higher in the fluconazole versus the placebo-treated group on DOL 14 (18.1 IU/L vs 15 IU/L), but no clinically significant abnormalities were observed. Candida albicans was the most common species isolated. There was no increase in species ofCandida noted for their intrinsic resistance to fluconazole, and there was no statistically significant difference in the minimal inhibitory concentrations to fluconazole for all C albicans isolates in either group at any period. Conclusion.: Prophylactic administration of fluconazole to the VLBW infant for the first 28 days of life is safe and results in a decreased risk of rectal colonization by candidal species. Larger studies to determine the effect of prophylaxis on candidal septicemia and development of resistance in such a selective high-risk group are warranted before initiation of routine prophylaxis. fluconazole, very low birth weight infant, prophylaxis, candidal sepsis, sensitivities to fluconazole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Price, M. F., LaRocco, M. T., & Gentry, L. O. (1994) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.38.6.1422 · Cited by 229
Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in very low birth weight infants during the first two weeks of life
Saxén, H., Hoppu, K., & Pohjavuori, M. (1993) · Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.1993.147 · Cited by 127
Cited by
Pappas, P. G., Kauffman, C. A., Andes, D. R., Clancy, C. J., Marr, K. A., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Reboli, A. C., Schuster, M. G., Vazquez, J. A., Walsh, T. J., et al. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/civ933 · Cited by 4,200
Candida parapsilosis, an Emerging Fungal Pathogen
Trofa, D., Gácser, A., & Nosanchuk, J. D. (2008) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00013-08 · Cited by 854
Fluconazole prophylaxis against fungal colonization and infection in preterm infants.
Kaufman, D., Boyle, R., Hazen, K. C., Patrie, J. T., Robinson, M., & Donowitz, L. G. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010494 · Cited by 523
Clinical Microbiology of Bacterial and Fungal Sepsis in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Kaufman, D., & Fairchild, K. D. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.17.3.638-680.2004 · Cited by 435
Hope, W. W., Castagnola, E., Groll, A. H., Roilides, E., Akova, M., Arendrup, M. C., Arikan-Akdagli, S., Bassetti, M., Bille, J., Cornely, O. A., et al. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12040 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Kicklighter, S. D., Springer, S. C., Cox, T., Hulsey, T. C., & Turner, R. B.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-298
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2075517361
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluconazole for Prophylaxis Against Candidal Rectal Colonization in the Very Low Birth Weight Infant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.107.2.293
- The paper
- Kicklighter, S. D., Springer, S. C., Cox, T., Hulsey, T. C., & Turner, R. B. (2001). Fluconazole for Prophylaxis Against Candidal Rectal Colonization in the Very Low Birth Weight Infant. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.2.293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.