The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Phenylketonuria: Screening and Management, October 16–18, 2000
Abstract
Objective.: To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data regarding screening for and management of phenylketonuria (PKU). Participants.: A nonfederal, nonadvocate, 14-member panel representing the fields of pediatrics, genetics, human development, public policy, nursing, and molecular physiology and including patient representatives. In addition, 19 experts in pediatrics, medical genetics, psychology, pediatric neurology, biochemical and molecular genetics, and gene therapy presented data to the panel and to a conference audience of 312. Evidence.: The literature was searched using Medline for January 1980 through July 2000, and an extensive bibliography of 3394 references was provided to the panel. Experts prepared abstracts for their conference presentations with relevant citations from the literature. Scientific evidence was given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience. Consensus Process.: The panel, answering predefined questions, developed its conclusions based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The panel composed a draft statement, which was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. Thereafter, the panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference. The draft statement was made available on the World Wide Web immediately after its release at the conference and was updated with the panel's final revisions. The statement is available at http://consensus.nih.gov. Conclusions.: Genetic testing for PKU has been in place for almost 40 years and has been very successful in preventing severe mental retardation in thousands of children and adults. Metabolic control is necessary across the lifespan of individuals with PKU. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary, integrated system is needed to delivery of care to individuals with PKU. Greatly needed are consistency and coordination between screening, treatment, data collection, and patient support programs. There should be equal access to culturally sensitive, age-appropriate treatment programs. Ethically sound, specific policies for storage, ownership, and use in future studies of archived samples remaining from PKU testing should be established. Research into the pathophysiology of PKU and relationship to genetic, neural, and behavioral variation is strongly encouraged. Uniform policies must be established to remove financial barriers to the acquisition of medical foods and modified low-protein foods and to provide access to support services needed to maintain metabolic control in individuals with PKU. Research on nondietary alternative treatments for PKU is strongly encouraged. To achieve optimal statistical power and cross-cultural applicability, it will be beneficial to use data acquired via national and international collaboration.phenylketonuria, hyperphenylalanimea, phenylketonuria screening, phenylalanine-restricted diet, maternal phenylketonuria, newborn screening, phenylalanine monitoring, phenylketonuria outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890
Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research
L'ABBÉ, K. A., DETSKY, A. S., & O'ROURKE, K. (1987) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-107-2-224 · Cited by 1,267
Cited by
Low‐calorie Sweeteners and Other Sugar Substitutes: A Review of the Safety Issues
Kroger, M., Meister, K., & Kava, R. (2006) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2006.tb00081.x · Cited by 381
Waisbren, S. E., Noel, K., Fahrbach, K., Cella, C., Frame, D., Dorenbaum, A., & Levy, H. (2007) · Molecular Genetics and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2007.05.006 · Cited by 329
Levy, H. L., Milanowski, A., Chakrapani, A., Cleary, M., Lee, P., Trefz, F. K., Whitley, C. B., Feillet, F., Feigenbaum, A. S., Bebchuk, J. D., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61234-3 · Cited by 320
Trefz, F. K., Burton, B. K., Longo, N., Casanova, M. M.-P., Gruskin, D. J., Dorenbaum, A., Kakkis, E. D., Crombez, E. A., Grange, D. K., Harmatz, P., et al. (2009) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.11.040 · Cited by 196
A combined risk score enhances prediction of type 1 diabetes among susceptible children
Ferrat, L. A., Vehik, K., Sharp, S. A., Lernmark, Å., Rewers, M. J., She, J.-X., Ziegler, A.-G., Toppari, J., Akolkar, B., Krischer, J. P., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0930-4 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Panel, N. I. O. H. C. D.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 972-982
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W4213167025
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Phenylketonuria: Screening and Management, October 16–18, 2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.108.4.972
- The paper
- Panel, N. I. O. H. C. D. (2001). National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Phenylketonuria: Screening and Management, October 16–18, 2000. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.4.972
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.