The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
US Birth Weight/Gestational Age-Specific Neonatal Mortality: 1995–1997 Rates for Whites, Hispanics, and Blacks
Open accessAbstract
Objective. In recent years, gains in neonatal survival have been most evident among very low birth weight, preterm, and low birth weight (LBW) infants. Most of the improvement in neonatal survival since the early 1980s seems to be the consequence of decreasing birth weight-specific mortality rates, which occurred during a period of increasing preterm and LBW rates. Although the decline in neonatal mortality has been widely publicized in the United States, research suggests that clinicians may still underestimate the chances of survival of an infant who is born too early or too small and may overestimate the eventuality of serious disability. So that clinicians may have current and needed ethnic- and race-specific estimates of the “chances” of early survival for newborn infants, we examined birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality rates for the 3 largest ethnic/racial groups in the United States: non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic blacks. Marked racial variation in birth weight and gestational age-specific mortality has long been recognized, and growing concerns have been raised about ongoing and increasing racial disparities in pregnancy outcomes. Our purpose for this investigation was to provide an up-to-date national reference for birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality rates for use by clinicians in care decision making and discussions with parents. Methods. The National Center for Health Statistics linked live birth-infant death cohort files for 1995–1997 were used for this study. Singleton live births to US resident mothers with a reported maternal ethnicity/race of non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, or Hispanic (n = 10 610 715) were selected for analysis. Birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality rates were calculated using 250 g/2-week intervals for each ethnic/racial group. Results. The overall neonatal mortality rates for whites, Hispanics, and blacks were 3.24, 3.45, and 8.16 neonatal deaths per 1000 live births, and the proportion of births <28 weeks was 0.35%, 0.45%, and 1.39%, respectively. Newborns who weighed <1500 g comprised <2.5% of all births in each racial/ethnic group but accounted for >50% of neonatal deaths. For whites, Hispanics, and blacks, >50% of newborns 24 to 25 weeks of gestational age survived. For most combinations of birth weights <3500 g and gestational ages of <37 weeks, the neonatal mortality rate was lowest among blacks, compared with whites or Hispanics. At these same gestational age/birth weight combinations, Hispanics have slightly lower mortality rates than whites. For combinations of birth weights >3500 g and gestational ages of 37 to 41 weeks, Hispanics had the lowest neonatal mortality rate. In these birth weight/gestational age combinations, where approximately two thirds of births occur, blacks had the highest neonatal mortality rate. Conclusions. Compared with earlier reports, these data suggest that a substantial improvement in birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality has occurred in the United States. Regardless of ethnicity/race, the risk of a neonatal death does not exceed 50% (the suggested definition for the limit of viability), except for birth weights below 500 g and gestational ages <24 weeks. Notwithstanding, ethnic/racial variations in neonatal mortality rates continue to persist, both in overall rates and within birth weight/gestational age categories. Blacks continue to have higher proportions for preterm and LBW births, compared with either whites or Hispanics. At the same time, blacks experience lower risks of neonatal mortality for preterm and LBW infants, while having higher risks of mortality among term, postterm, normal birth weight, and macrosomic births.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yu, S. M. (1998) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1021801927353 · Cited by 4,056
A united states national reference for fetal growth
ALEXANDER, G., HIMES, J., KAUFMAN, R., MOR, J., & KOGAN, M. (1996) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-x · Cited by 2,294
Self-citationLemons, J. A., Bauer, C. R., Oh, W., Korones, S. B., Papile, L.-A., Stoll, B. J., Verter, J., Temprosa, M., Wright, L. L., Ehrenkranz, R. A., et al. (2001) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.107.1.e1 · Cited by 1,445
Self-citationOutcomes in Young Adulthood for Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Hack, M., Flannery, D. J., Schluchter, M., Cartar, L., Borawski, E., & Klein, N. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010856 · Cited by 1,204
Mathews, T. J., MacDorman, M. F., & Menacker, F. (2002) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e558952006-001 · Cited by 842
Goldenberg, R. L., & Rouse, D. J. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199807303390506 · Cited by 758
The Limit of Viability -- Neonatal Outcome of Infants Born at 22 to 25 Weeks' Gestation
Allen, M. C., Donohue, P. K., & Dusman, A. E. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199311253292201 · Cited by 447
Self-citationThe Problem of Low Birth Weight
Paneth, N. S. (1995) · The Future of Children · doi:10.2307/1602505 · Cited by 389
NICHD Neonatal Research Network
Wright, L. L. (2002) · 日本未熟児新生児学会雑誌 · Cited by 384
Hoyert, D. L., Kochanek, K. D., & Murphy, S. L. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 357
Cited by
An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood
Saigal, S., & Doyle, L. W. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60136-1 · Cited by 2,818
What Causes Racial Disparities in Very Preterm Birth? A Biosocial Perspective
Kramer, M. R., & Hogue, C. R. (2009) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/ajerev/mxp003 · Cited by 255
Secular trends in socio-economic status and the implications for preterm birth
Thompson, J. M. D., Irgens, L. M., Rasmussen, S., & Daltveit, A. K. (2006) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00711.x · Cited by 138
Maurizio Romeo, D. M., Guzzetta, A., Scoto, M., Cioni, M., Patusi, P., Mazzone, D., & Giuseppe Romeo, M. (2008) · European Journal of Paediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.07.008 · Cited by 129
Early determination of prognosis in neonatal moderate or severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
Ambalavanan, N., Shankaran, S., Laptook, A. R., Carper, B. A., Das, A., Carlo, W. A., Cotten, C. M., Duncan, A. F., & Higgins, R. D. (2021) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2020-048678 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexander, G. R., Kogan, M., Bader, D., Carlo, W., Allen, M., & Mor, J.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e61-e66
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2108284037
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 35.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: US Birth Weight/Gestational Age-Specific Neonatal Mortality: 1995–1997 Rates for Whites, Hispanics, and Blacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.111.1.e61
- The paper
- Alexander, G. R., Kogan, M., Bader, D., Carlo, W., Allen, M., & Mor, J. (2003). US Birth Weight/Gestational Age-Specific Neonatal Mortality: 1995–1997 Rates for Whites, Hispanics, and Blacks. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.111.1.e61
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.