Cited by 129Infant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

Early neurologic assessment in preterm-infants: Integration of traditional neurologic examination and observation of general movements

Maurizio Romeo, Domenico Marco, Guzzetta, Andrea, Scoto, Mariacristina, Cioni, Matteo, Patusi, Pietro, Mazzone, Domenico, Giuseppe Romeo, Mario·2008·European Journal of Paediatric Neurology

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the possible additional benefit in terms of prognostic accuracy of an integrated application of a traditional scorable method of neurologic examination and the Prechtl's method of qualitative assessment of general movements (GMs) in a large population of 903 consecutive preterm infants.Study design Infants were enrolled from the Intensive Care Unit of the University of Catania. Inclusion criteria were a gestational age below 37 weeks and the absence of genetic disorders. All infants underwent serial ultrasound and at 3 months performed both the GMs assessment and the Hammersmith Infant Neurologic Examination (HINE). Outcome was assessed at 2 years by the Touwen neurologic examination and the Clinical Adaptive Test/Clinical, Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale.Results The integration of the two methods was shown to be more effective than the single assessments in predicting neurologic outcome. The additional benefit of combining the two approaches was particularly clear for the discrimination between unilateral and bilateral cerebral palsy.Conclusions The integrated use of a scorable neurological examination and Prechtl's assessment of GMs can improve early prediction of neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants and should complement other clinical and instrumental exams in follow-up programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.07.008

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maurizio Romeo, D. M., Guzzetta, A., Scoto, M., Cioni, M., Patusi, P., Mazzone, D., & Giuseppe Romeo, M.
Affiliations
University of Catania (IT)
Corresponding author
Guzzetta, Andrea
Venue
European Journal of Paediatric Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
183-189
ISSN
1090-3798 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171156347
Cited by
129
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Paediatric Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Keywords
preterm infants, neurologic assessment, General Movements Assessment, neurodevelopmental outcome prediction, cerebral palsy, neurodevelopmental follow-up
MeSH terms
Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Movement, Neurologic Examination, Psychomotor Disorders, Videotape Recording, Observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review