Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Empirical Therapy for Neonatal Candidemia in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Benjamin, Daniel K., DeLong, Elizabeth R., Steinbach, William J., Cotton, Charles M., Walsh, Thomas J., Clark, Reese H.·2003·Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective. Neonatal candidemia is often fatal. Empirical antifungal therapy is associated with improved survival in neonates and patients with fever and neutropenia. Although guidelines for empirical therapy exist for patients with fever and neutropenia, these do not exist for neonates. Methods. A multicenter, retrospective, cohort study was conducted of neonatal intensive care unit patients (N = 6172) who had a blood culture (N = 21 233) after day of life 3 and whose birth weight was ≤1250 g. We performed multivariable conditional logistic regression of risk factors for candidemia. From the regression modeling coefficients, we developed a candidemia score. Results. In multivariable modeling, thrombocytopenia (odds ratio [OR]: 3.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.68–4.74) and cephalosporin or carbapenem use in the 7 days before obtaining the blood culture (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.33–2.29) were risk factors for subsequent candidemia. Children who were 25 to 27 weeks’ estimated gestational age (OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.52–3.05) and children who were born at <25 weeks (OR: 4.15; 95% CI: 3.12–6.29) were at higher risk of developing candidemia than were children who were born at ≥28 weeks. We developed a candidemia score on the basis of the ORs from the multivariable model. Children with a candidemia score ≥2 points were classified as having a “positive” score, and a score of ≥2 points had a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 47%. Conclusions. We developed a clinical predictive model for neonatal candidemia with high sensitivity and moderate specificity for candidemia. On the basis of our model, when a physician obtains a blood culture, the physician should consider providing antifungal therapy to neonates who are <25 weeks’ estimated gestational age and to neonates who have thrombocytopenia at the time of blood culture. In addition, if a physician obtains a blood culture from a child who is 25 to 27 weeks’ estimated gestational age and is not thrombocytopenic but has a history of third-generation cephalosporin or carbapenem exposure in the 7 days before the blood culture, then the physician should consider administration of empirical antifungal therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.112.3.543

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Benjamin, D. K., DeLong, E. R., Steinbach, W. J., Cotton, C. M., Walsh, T. J., & Clark, R. H.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
112
Issue
3
Pages
543-547
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2121368434
Cited by
199
References
4
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empirical Therapy for Neonatal Candidemia in Very Low Birth Weight Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.112.3.543
The paper
Benjamin, D. K., DeLong, E. R., Steinbach, W. J., Cotton, C. M., Walsh, T. J., & Clark, R. H. (2003). Empirical Therapy for Neonatal Candidemia in Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.3.543

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.