The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Brief Screening Questionnaire for Infant Sleep Problems: Validation and Findings for an Internet Sample
Abstract
Objective. To develop and validate (using subjective and objective methods) a brief infant sleep questionnaire (BISQ) that would be appropriate for screening in pediatric settings. Design. Two studies were performed to assess the properties of the BISQ. Study I compared BISQ measures with sleep diary measures and objective actigraphic sleep measures for clinical (N = 43) and control (N = 57) groups of infants (5–29 months of age). The second study was based on an Internet survey of 1028 respondents who completed the BISQ posted on an infant sleep web site. Results. In study I, BISQ measures were found to be correlated significantly with sleep measures derived from actigraphy and sleep diaries. BISQ measures (number of night wakings and nocturnal sleep duration) were the best predictors for distinguishing between clinical and control samples. High test-retest correlations (r > .82) were demonstrated for BISQ measures for a subsample of 26 infants. Study II provided a developmental perspective on BISQ measures. The study demonstrated that BISQ measures derived from a large Internet survey provided developmental and sleep ecology-related findings that corresponded to the existing literature findings on sleep patterns in early childhood. Conclusions. The findings provide psychometric, clinical, and ecologic support for the use of the BISQ as a brief infant sleep screening tool for clinical and research purposes. Potential clinical cutoff scores are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sleep Problems in Early Childhood: Continuities, Predictive Factors, and Behavioral Correlates
Zuckerman, B., Stevenson, J., & Bailey, V. (1987) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.80.5.664 · Cited by 472
Infant sleep problems and postnatal depression: a community-based study
Hiscock, H., & Wake, M. (2001) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.107.6.1317 · Cited by 368
Hauri, P., & Olmstead, E. (1980) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/3.1.59 · Cited by 117
Cited by
The role and validity of actigraphy in sleep medicine: an update
Sadeh, A. (2011) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2010.10.001 · Cited by 1,415
Self-citationMorgenthaler, T., Alessi, C., Friedman, L., Owens, J., Kapur, V., Boehlecke, B., Brown, T., Chesson, A., Coleman, J., Lee-Chiong, T., et al. (2007) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/30.4.519 · Cited by 1,142
Normal sleep patterns in infants and children: A systematic review of observational studies
Galland, B. C., Taylor, B. J., Elder, D. E., & Herbison, P. (2012) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2011.06.001 · Cited by 734
Sadeh, A., Tikotzky, L., & Scher, A. (2010) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2009.05.003 · Cited by 595
Self-citationMindell, J. A., Meltzer, L. J., Carskadon, M. A., & Chervin, R. D. (2009) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2008.07.016 · Cited by 542
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadeh, A.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e570-e577
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2122475407
- Cited by
- 880
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Brief Screening Questionnaire for Infant Sleep Problems: Validation and Findings for an Internet Sample. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.113.6.e570
- The paper
- Sadeh, A. (2004). A Brief Screening Questionnaire for Infant Sleep Problems: Validation and Findings for an Internet Sample. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.6.e570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.