Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Summary Proceedings From the Neonatal Pain-Control Group

Anand, Kanwaljeet J.S., Aranda, Jacob V., Berde, Charles B., Buckman, ShaAvhrée, Capparelli, Edmund V., Carlo, Waldemar, Hummel, Patricia, Johnston, C. Celeste, Lantos, John, Tutag-Lehr, Victoria, Lynn, Anne M., Maxwell, Lynne G., Oberlander, Tim F., Raju, Tonse N.K., Soriano, Sulpicio G., Taddio, Anna, Walco, Gary A.·2006·Pediatrics

Abstract

Recent advances in neurobiology and clinical medicine have established that the fetus and newborn may experience acute, established, and chronic pain. They respond to such noxious stimuli by a series of complex biochemical, physiologic, and behavioral alterations. Studies have concluded that controlling pain experience is beneficial with respect to short-term and perhaps long-term outcomes. Yet, pain-control measures are adopted infrequently because of unresolved scientific issues and lack of appreciation for the need for control of pain and its long-term sequelae during the critical phases of neurologic maturation in the preterm and term newborn. The neonatal pain-control group, as part of the Newborn Drug Development Initiative (NDDI) Workshop I, addressed these concerns. The specific issues addressed were (1) management of pain associated with invasive procedures, (2) provision of sedation and analgesia during mechanical ventilation, and (3) mitigation of pain and stress responses during and after surgery in the newborn infant. The cross-cutting themes addressed within each category included (1) clinical-trial designs, (2) drug prioritization, (3) ethical constraints, (4) gaps in our knowledge, and (5) future research needs. This article provides a summary of the discussions and deliberations. Full-length articles on procedural pain, sedation and analgesia for ventilated infants, perioperative pain, and study designs for neonatal pain research were published in Clinical Therapeutics (June 2005).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2005-0620c

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 109 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Anand, K. J. S., Aranda, J. V., Berde, C. B., Buckman, S., Capparelli, E. V., Carlo, W., Hummel, P., Johnston, C. C., Lantos, J., Tutag-Lehr, V., Lynn, A. M., Maxwell, L. G., Oberlander, T. F., Raju, T. N. K., Soriano, S. G., Taddio, A., & Walco, G. A.
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2006-03-01
Volume
117
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
S9-S22
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W1876243881
Cited by
276
References
109
FWCI
17.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Summary Proceedings From the Neonatal Pain-Control Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2005-0620c
The paper
Anand, K. J. S., Aranda, J. V., Berde, C. B., Buckman, S., Capparelli, E. V., Carlo, W., Hummel, P., Johnston, C. C., Lantos, J., Tutag-Lehr, V., Lynn, A. M., Maxwell, L. G., Oberlander, T. F., Raju, T. N. K., Soriano, S. G., Taddio, A., & Walco, G. A. (2006). Summary Proceedings From the Neonatal Pain-Control Group. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-0620c

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.