Adoption of Electronic Health Records in Primary Care Pediatric Practices
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND. Electronic health records may improve care delivery. Although professional organizations and federal agencies encourage widespread adoption, no national data are available regarding the penetration of electronic health records into primary care pediatric practices. METHODS. We used a national mail survey of 1000 randomly selected primary care pediatricians conducted from August to November 2005. RESULTS. The response rate was 58%. Overall, 21.3% of respondents had an electronic health record in their practice. The likelihood of having an electronic health record increased with practice size. Those in a practice network were more likely to have an electronic health record than those in other settings. Smaller and independent practices were less likely to be considering implementing an electronic health record. Although most electronic health records include some pediatric-specific functionality such as the ability to record immunizations, many do not offer decision support; only approximately one third included immunization prompts or alerts for abnormal laboratory results. Cost was a barrier for nearly all of those without an electronic health record; half of the respondents questioned whether electronic health records lead to improvement in quality of care, and many could not identify an electronic health record that would meet their practice requirements. CONCLUSIONS. Electronic health records are concentrated in larger and networked pediatric practices. Smaller and independent pediatric practices, the most common types of practice, are unlikely to adopt electronic health records until the cost of implementing and maintaining the systems decreases, developing standards for interoperability are adopted, and electronic health records are widely perceived to improve quality of care by practicing general pediatricians. The lack of decision support in current electronic health records may limit the ability of these tools to improve care delivery.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Health care providers may have had previous negative technology experiences.
“For example, health care providers may lack the adequate computer skills to use eHealth systems or had previous negative technology experiences [49,121].”
From Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review (2013) · cites this paper as [121]
Health care providers may lack adequate computer skills to use eHealth systems.
“For example, health care providers may lack the adequate computer skills to use eHealth systems or had previous negative technology experiences [49,121].”
From Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review (2013) · cites this paper as [121]
Cites
The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care
(1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-11-976_1 · Cited by 999 · see citing works
Position Paper: A Proposal for Electronic Medical Records in U.S. Primary Care
Bates, D., Ebell, M., Gotlieb, E., Zapp, J., & Mullins, H. C. (2003) · J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1097 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Medical Groups’ Adoption Of Electronic Health Records And Information Systems
Gans, D. N., Kralewski, J. E., Hammons, T., & Dowd, B. E. (2005) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1323 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
The Value Of Electronic Health Records In Solo Or Small Group Practices
Miller, R. H., West, C., Brown, T., Sim, I., & Ganchoff, C. (2005) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1127 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Health Care Information Technology
Hersh, W. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.18.2273 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Middleton, B. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1669 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation: The CHICA System
Anand, V., Biondich, P., Liu, G. C., Rosenman, M. B., & Downs, S. M. (2004) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-187 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Use of computerized clinical support systems in medical settings: United States, 2001-03.
Burt, C. W., & Hing, E. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Barriers That Impede the Adoption of Pediatric Information Technology
Johnson, K. B. (2001) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.155.12.1374 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Special Requirements for Electronic Medical Record Systems in Pediatrics
Task Force on Medical Informatics (2001) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.108.2.513 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-231 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review
Li, J., Talaei-Khoei, A., Seale, H., Ray, P., & MacIntyre, C. R. (2013) · interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/ijmr.2468 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Castillo, V. H., Martínez-García, A. I., & Pulido, J. (2010) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-10-60 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Smith, N., Iyer, R. L., Langer-Gould, A., Getahun, D. T., Strickland, D., Jacobsen, S. J., Chen, W., Derose, S. F., & Koebnick, C. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-316 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“Electronic health records have been successfully used to improve patient care [4-6].”
Method
- Authors
- Kemper, A. R., Uren, R. L., & Clark, S. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2006-07-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e20-e24
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2121197500
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 18.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, technology adoption, pediatric primary care, practice size, networks of practice, implementation barriers, cost barriers, clinical decision support, interoperability standards, quality of care, pediatricians
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Pediatrics, Primary Health Care, United States, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Health Care Surveys, Decision Support Systems, Clinical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review