Cited by 130Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Adoption of Electronic Health Records in Primary Care Pediatric Practices

Open access
Kemper, Alex R., Uren, Rebecca L., Clark, Sarah J.·2006·Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Electronic health records may improve care delivery. Although professional organizations and federal agencies encourage widespread adoption, no national data are available regarding the penetration of electronic health records into primary care pediatric practices. METHODS. We used a national mail survey of 1000 randomly selected primary care pediatricians conducted from August to November 2005. RESULTS. The response rate was 58%. Overall, 21.3% of respondents had an electronic health record in their practice. The likelihood of having an electronic health record increased with practice size. Those in a practice network were more likely to have an electronic health record than those in other settings. Smaller and independent practices were less likely to be considering implementing an electronic health record. Although most electronic health records include some pediatric-specific functionality such as the ability to record immunizations, many do not offer decision support; only approximately one third included immunization prompts or alerts for abnormal laboratory results. Cost was a barrier for nearly all of those without an electronic health record; half of the respondents questioned whether electronic health records lead to improvement in quality of care, and many could not identify an electronic health record that would meet their practice requirements. CONCLUSIONS. Electronic health records are concentrated in larger and networked pediatric practices. Smaller and independent pediatric practices, the most common types of practice, are unlikely to adopt electronic health records until the cost of implementing and maintaining the systems decreases, developing standards for interoperability are adopted, and electronic health records are widely perceived to improve quality of care by practicing general pediatricians. The lack of decision support in current electronic health records may limit the ability of these tools to improve care delivery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2005-3000

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Health care providers may have had previous negative technology experiences.

    “For example, health care providers may lack the adequate computer skills to use eHealth systems or had previous negative technology experiences [49,121].”
  • Health care providers may lack adequate computer skills to use eHealth systems.

    “For example, health care providers may lack the adequate computer skills to use eHealth systems or had previous negative technology experiences [49,121].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kemper, A. R., Uren, R. L., & Clark, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2006-07-01
Volume
118
Issue
1
Pages
e20-e24
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2121197500
Cited by
130
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
18.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
electronic health records, technology adoption, pediatric primary care, practice size, networks of practice, implementation barriers, cost barriers, clinical decision support, interoperability standards, quality of care, pediatricians
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Pediatrics, Primary Health Care, United States, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Health Care Surveys, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review