Cited by 62Medical Coding and Health InformationElectronic Health Records SystemsRace, Genetics, and Society

Health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in children

Open access
Smith, Ning, Iyer, Rajan L, Langer-Gould, Annette, Getahun, Darios T, Strickland, Daniel, Jacobsen, Steven J, Chen, Wansu, Derose, Stephen F +1 more·2010·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

Background: To understand racial and ethnic disparities in health care utilization and their potential underlying causes, valid information on race and ethnicity is necessary. However, the validity of pediatric race and ethnicity information in administrative records from large integrated health care systems using electronic medical records is largely unknown. Methods: Information on race and ethnicity of 325,810 children born between 1998-2008 was extracted from health plan administrative records and compared to birth certificate records. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated for correct classification of race and ethnicity in administrative records compared to birth certificate records. Results: Misclassification of ethnicity and race in administrative records occurred in 23.1% and 33.6% children, respectively; the majority due to missing ethnicity (48.3%) and race (40.9%) information. Misclassification was most common in children of minority groups. PPV for White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaskan Native, multiple and other was 89.3%, 86.6%, 73.8%, 18.2%, 51.8% and 1.2%, respectively. PPV for Hispanic ethnicity was 95.6%. Racial and ethnic information improved with increasing number of medical visits. Subgroup analyses comparing racial classification between non-Hispanics and Hispanics showed White, Black and Asian race was more accurate among non-Hispanics than Hispanics. Conclusions: In children, race and ethnicity information from administrative records has significant limitations in accurately identifying small minority groups. These results suggest that the quality of racial information obtained from administrative records may benefit from additional supplementation by birth certificate data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-10-316

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Misclassification bias was noted as a problem or potential problem in 18 of the 26 (69%) articles about the plausibility of race/ethnicity data.

    “Misclassification bias, that is, incorrect assignment, was noted as a problem or a potential problem in 18 of the 26 (69%) articles about the plausibility of race/ethnicity data.11,13,23–38”
  • Multiple studies recommended comparing and linking data across an individual's record to fill in or correct missing data fields, either to increase completeness and/or to check the accuracy of implausible data.

    “This method compares and links data across an individual’s record in order to fill in or correct missing data fields and was recommended by several studies as a way to either increase completeness26,28,49,60,62,64,72 and/or check the accuracy of implausible data.13,26,28”
  • Smith et al. recommended supplementing race/ethnicity data from the EHR with birth certificate data to increase completeness and plausibility.

    “For example, Smith et al.26 recommended supplementing race/ethnicity data from the EHR with birth certificate data to increase completeness and plausibility.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bordowitz R Morland K Reich D The use of an electronic medical record to improve documentation and treatment of obesity FamMed 2007 39 4 274 279 17401772
  2. Cebul RD Using electronic medical records to measure and improve performance Trans Am ClinClimatolAssoc 2008 119 65 75 PMC2394701 18596863
  3. Dunn MJ Benefits of electronic medical records outweigh every challenge WMJ 2007 106 3 159 160 17642356
  4. Wu RC Straus SE Evidence for handheld electronic medical records in improving care: a systematic review BMCMedInformDecisMak 2006 6 26 PMC1538581 16787539
  5. Baumeister L Marchi K Pearl M Williams R Braveman P The validity of information on "race" and "Hispanic ethnicity" in California birth certificate data Health ServRes 2000 35 4 869 883 PMC1089157 11055453
  6. Schoendorf KC Parker JD Batkhan LZ Kiely JL Comparability of the birth certificate and 1988 Maternal and Infant Health Survey Vital Health Stat 2 1993 116 1 19 8328134
  7. Arday SL Arday DR Monroe S Zhang J HCFA's racial and ethnic data: current accuracy and recent improvements Health Care FinancRev 2000 21 4 107 116 PMC4194641 11481739

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, N., Iyer, R. L., Langer-Gould, A., Getahun, D. T., Strickland, D., Jacobsen, S. J., Chen, W., Derose, S. F., & Koebnick, C.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Koebnick, Corinna
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2010-11-23
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
316-316
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996503617
Cited by
62
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R21DK085395)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
racial misclassification, children, Hispanic origin, minority groups, positive predictive value, electronic health records
MeSH terms
Birth Certificates, California, Child, Child, Preschool, Delivery of Health Care, Ethnicity, Female, Health Planning, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality Control, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Racial Groups, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review