CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 119Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiac Safety of Central Nervous System Stimulants in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Winterstein, Almut G., Gerhard, Tobias, Shuster, Jonathan, Johnson, Michael, Zito, Julie M., Saidi, Arwa·2007·Pediatrics
DOI 10.1542/peds.2007-0675
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. Case reports have raised concerns about the risk of cardiac events associated with central nervous system stimulants for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. PATIENTS AND METHODS. This was a retrospective cohort study that used 10 years (July 1994 to June 2004) of Florida Medicaid claims data cross-linked to Vital Statistics Death Registry data. The cohort was composed of all youth 3 to 20 years old who were newly diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Each month of follow-up was classified according to stimulant claims (methylphenidate, amphetamines, and pemoline) as current use (active stimulant claim), former use (time after periods of current use), or nonuse (time preceding the first stimulant claim, including follow-up of youth who were never exposed to stimulants). The study's end points were (1) cardiac death, (2) first hospital admission for cardiac causes or (3) first emergency department visit for cardiac causes. Risks were compared with time-dependent Cox regression analysis adjusting for various cardiac risk factors. RESULTS. During 124932 person-years of observation (n = 55383), 73 youth died, 5 because of cardiac causes. No cardiac death occurred during 42612 person-years of stimulant use. Hospital admissions for cardiac cause occurred for 27 children (8 during stimulant use, 11 during 35671 person-years of former use, and 8 during 46649 person-years of nonuse); and 1091 children visited the emergency department for cardiac causes (8.7 per 1000 person-years). Current stimulant use was associated with a 20% increase in the hazard for emergency department visits when compared with nonuse. No increased risk was found for periods of former use when compared with nonuse. CONCLUSIONS. Incidence rates of cardiac events requiring hospitalization were small and similar to national background rates. Stimulants were associated with an increase in cardiac emergency department visits. More evidence is needed that addresses the long-term risk/benefit of the various treatment options and the effect of other cardiac risk factors and comedications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2007-0675

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stowe CD, Gardner SF, Gist CC, et al. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in male children receiving stimulant therapy. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:1142–1149 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–119 of 119

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Winterstein, A. G., Gerhard, T., Shuster, J., Johnson, M., Zito, J. M., & Saidi, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Healthcare Administration, College of Pharmacy
  • Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Health Policy, General Clinical Research Center
  • Gainesville Mental Health Partners, Gainesville, Florida
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
ORCID
Venue
Pediatrics
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Published
2007-12-01
Volume
120
Issue
6
Pages
e1494-e1501
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
DOI
10.1542/peds.2007-0675
OpenAlex
W2136389780
Cited by
119
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 21
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U18HS016097)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, psychostimulants, cardiac safety, methylphenidate, amphetamine, pemoline, cardiovascular mortality, emergency department visits, children and adolescents, stimulant use
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review