Cited by 56Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentPharmaceutical studies and practices

Cardiac Safety of Methylphenidate Versus Amphetamine Salts in the Treatment of ADHD

Open access
Winterstein, Almut Gertrud, Gerhard, Tobias, Shuster, Jonathan, Saidi, Arwa·2009·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Safety concerns about central nervous system stimulants for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) include adverse cardiac effects. This study aimed to compare the risk for cardiac events in users of methylphenidate and amphetamine salts. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design using claims data from the Florida Medicaid fee-for-service program representing a total of 2131953 children and adolescents was used. The analysis included all beneficiaries who were between 3 and 20 years of age, enrolled between July 1994 and June 2004, had at least 1 physician diagnosis of ADHD and were newly started on methylphenidate or amphetamine salts. Each month of follow-up was classified according to stimulant use into current use or former use. We defined cardiac events as first emergency department (ED) visit for cardiac disease or symptoms. Risk between current users of methylphenidate versus amphetamine salts and former users of drugs in these categories was compared by using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazard model that adjusted for differences in gender; race; age; year of the index date; disability; congenital anomalies; history of circulatory disease; history of hospital admission; and use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and bronchodilators. RESULTS: A total of 456 youth visited the ED for cardiac reasons during 52783 years of follow-up. After adjustment for differences in covariates, the risk for cardiac ED visits was similar among current users of methylphenidate or amphetamines. Periods of former use had a similar risk between youth with an exposure history to methylphenidate or amphetamine. CONCLUSION: Exposure to methylphenidate and amphetamines salts showed similar risk for cardiac ED visits. Additional population-based studies that address manifestation of serious heart disease, especially after long-term use, dosage comparisons, and interactions with preexisting cardiac risk factors are needed to inform psychiatric treatment decisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2008-3138

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Common effects of stimulants on blood pressure, heart rate and exercise parameters are usually of no clinical significance.

    “however, the common effects on blood pressure, heart rate and exercise parameters are usually of no clinical significance [55-57].”

    From Advances in understanding and treating ADHD (2011) · cites this paper as [57]

  • A recent retrospective study concluded that exposure to methylphenidate and amfetamine salts showed similar risks for cardiac emergency department visits.

    “A recent retrospective study concluded that exposure to methylphenidate and amfetamine salts showed similar risks for cardiac emergency department visits [158].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winterstein, A. G., Gerhard, T., Shuster, J., & Saidi, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Policy, General Clinical Research Center
  • University of Florida (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2009-07-01
Volume
124
Issue
1
Pages
e75-e80
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2156002863
Cited by
56
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000064)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U18HS016097)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
methylphenidate, amphetamine salts, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, cardiac safety, psychostimulants, emergency department visits, pediatric drug use, Medicaid beneficiaries, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Blood Pressure, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Heart, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Retrospective Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review