The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early Determinants of Fruit and Vegetable Acceptance
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to evaluate the effects of breastfeeding and dietary experiences on acceptance of a fruit and a green vegetable by 4- to 8-month-old infants. METHODS. Forty-five infants, 44% of whom were breastfed, were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 treatment groups. One group was fed green beans, and the other was fed green beans and then peaches at the same time of day for 8 consecutive days. Acceptance of both foods, as determined by a variety of measures, was assessed before and after the home-exposure period. RESULTS. During the initial exposure, infants ate more calories from peaches than from green beans. Breastfed infants showed greater liking of peaches, as did their mothers, who ate more fruits in general than did mothers who formula fed. Although formula-feeding mothers ate more green beans, there was no difference in their infants' acceptance of this vegetable. For breastfed and formula-fed infants, repeated dietary exposure to green beans, with or without peaches, resulted in greater consumption of green beans (56.8 vs 93.6 g). Only infants who experienced green beans with peaches displayed fewer facial expressions of distaste during feeding. Mothers were apparently unaware of these changes in acceptance. CONCLUSIONS. Breastfeeding confers an advantage in initial acceptance of a food, but only if mothers eat the food regularly. Once weaned, infants who receive repeated dietary exposure to a food eat more of it and may learn to like its flavor. However, because infants innately display facial expressions of distaste in response to certain flavors, caregivers may hesitate to continue offering these foods. Mothers should be encouraged to provide their infants with repeated opportunities to taste fruits and vegetables and should focus not only on their infants' facial expressions but also on their willingness to continue feeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w · Cited by 2,137
Steiner, J. E., Glaser, D., Hawilo, M. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2001) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00051-8 · Cited by 752
Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences.
Mennella, J. A., Pepino, M. Y., & Reed, D. R. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1582 · Cited by 576
Self-citation
Cited by
Anzman, S. L., Rollins, B. Y., & Birch, L. L. (2010) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2010.43 · Cited by 369
Age modifies the genotype-phenotype relationship for the bitter receptor TAS2R38.
Mennella, J. A., Pepino, M. Y., Duke, F. F., & Reed, D. R. (2010) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-11-60 · Cited by 185
Self-citationBirch, L. L., & Anzman, S. L. (2010) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00132.x · Cited by 176
Laureati, M., Bergamaschi, V., & Pagliarini, E. (2014) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.031 · Cited by 168
Bouret, S., Levin, B. E., & Ozanne, S. E. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00007.2014 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Forestell, C. A., & Mennella, J. A.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2007-12-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1247-1254
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2108160164
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Determinants of Fruit and Vegetable Acceptance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2007-0858
- The paper
- Forestell, C. A., & Mennella, J. A. (2007). Early Determinants of Fruit and Vegetable Acceptance. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0858
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.