Cited by 209Child Development and Digital TechnologyAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Childhood Television Viewing Lead to Attention Problems in Adolescence? Results From a Prospective Longitudinal Study

Abstract

CONTEXT: There is controversy over whether childhood television viewing causes attention problems. The findings from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have been mixed. To our knowledge, no longitudinal studies have assessed the impact of children's television viewing on attention problems in adolescence. The objective of this study was to assess this association. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND SETTING: Study members were a general population birth cohort of 1037 participants (502 female) born in Dunedin, New Zealand, between April 1972 and March 1973. Parental estimates of children's television-viewing time were obtained at ages 5, 7, 9, and 11 years. Self-, parent-, and teacher-reported attention problems in adolescence were obtained at ages 13 and 15 years. RESULTS: The mean of hours of television viewing during childhood was associated with symptoms of attention problems in adolescence. These associations remained significant after controlling for gender, attention problems in early childhood, cognitive ability at 5 years of age, and childhood socioeconomic status. This association was also independent of adolescent television viewing. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood television viewing was associated with attention problems in adolescence, independent of early attention problems and other confounders. These results support the hypothesis that childhood television viewing may contribute to the development of attention problems and suggest that the effects may be long-lasting.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2007-0978

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rutter M, Tizard J, Whitmore K, eds. Education, Health and Behaviour: Psychological and Medical Study of Childhood Development. New York, NY: Wiley; 1970
  2. Elley WB, Irving JC. The Elley-Irving socioeconomic index 1981 census revision. N Z Journal Educ Stud. 1985;29:115–128

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 209

Metadata

Authors
Landhuis, C. E., Poulton, R., Welch, D., & Hancox, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2007-09-01
Volume
120
Issue
3
Pages
532-537
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2116891150
Cited by
209
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
FWCI
39.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attention deficits, adolescence, media influence, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, longitudinal cohort, Dunedin birth cohort, socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New Zealand, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Television, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review