Cited by 202Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsPhysical Activity and Health

Extensive Television Viewing and the Development of Attention and Learning Difficulties During Adolescence

Johnson, Jeffrey G., Cohen, Patricia, Kasen, Stephanie, Brook, Judith S.·2007·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of television viewing with educational and intellectual outcomes during adolescence and early adulthood. DESIGN: Prospective epidemiological study. SETTING: Families participating in the Children in the Community Study, a prospective longitudinal investigation, were interviewed at mean offspring ages 14, 16, and 22 years. PARTICIPANTS: A community-based sample of 678 families from upstate New York. MAIN EXPOSURES: Television viewing, attention difficulties, learning difficulties, and educational achievement during adolescence and early adulthood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Disorganizing Poverty Interview and age-appropriate versions of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children. RESULTS: Frequent television viewing during adolescence was associated with elevated risk for subsequent attention and learning difficulties after family characteristics and prior cognitive difficulties were controlled. Youths who watched 1 or more hours of television per day at mean age 14 years were at elevated risk for poor homework completion, negative attitudes toward school, poor grades, and long-term academic failure. Youths who watched 3 or more hours of television per day were the most likely to experience these outcomes. In addition, youths who watched 3 or more hours of television per day were at elevated risk for subsequent attention problems and were the least likely to receive postsecondary education. There was little evidence of bidirectionality in the association of television viewing with attention and learning difficulties. CONCLUSION: Frequent television viewing during adolescence may be associated with risk for development of attention problems, learning difficulties, and adverse long-term educational outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpedi.161.5.480

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, J. G., Cohen, P., Kasen, S., & Brook, J. S.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
161
Issue
5
Pages
480
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169031490
Cited by
202
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
30.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060911, MH 49191, MH-36971, MH60911, R01MH049191, MH 38916, R01MH036971)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 03188, R01DA003188)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
television viewing, attention deficits, learning difficulties, academic performance, school failure, homework completion, attitudes toward school, postsecondary education, adolescence, early adulthood, bidirectional relationship
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Age Factors, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Educational Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Learning, Learning Disabilities, New York, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, Television, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review