Cited by 312Heavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityHeavy metals in environmentHuman Health and Disease

Trends in Blood Lead Levels and Blood Lead Testing Among US Children Aged 1 to 5 Years, 1988–2004

Jones, Robert L., Homa, David M., Meyer, Pamela A., Brody, Debra J., Caldwell, Kathleen L., Pirkle, James L., Brown, Mary Jean·2009·Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate trends in children's blood lead levels and the extent of blood lead testing of children at risk for lead poisoning from national surveys conducted during a 16-year period in the United States. Methods Data for children aged 1 to 5 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III Phase I, 1988-1991, and Phase II, 1991-1994 were compared to data from the survey period 1999-2004. Results The prevalence of elevated blood lead levels, >/=10 microg/dL, among children decreased from 8.6% in 1988-1991 to 1.4% in 1999-2004, which is an 84% decline. From 1988-1991 and 1999-2004, children's geometric mean blood lead levels declined in non-Hispanic black (5.2-2.8 microg/dL), Mexican American (3.9-1.9 microg/dL), and non-Hispanic white children (3.1 microg/dL to 1.7 microg/dL). However, levels continue to be highest among non-Hispanic black children relative to Mexican American and non-Hispanic white children. Blood lead levels were distributed as follows: 14.0% were /=10 microg/dL. Multivariable analysis indicated that residence in older housing, poverty, age, and being non-Hispanic black are still major risk factors for higher lead levels. Blood lead testing of Medicaid-enrolled children increased to 41.9% from 19.2% in 1988-1991. Only 43.0% of children with elevated blood lead levels had previously been tested. Conclusions Children's blood lead levels continue to decline in the United States, even in historically high-risk groups for lead poiso…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2007-3608

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The second instrumental variables strategy is based on Rhode Island policies implemented in 1997 that required landlords to ensure that rental homes were free of lead hazards.

    “The second strategy is based on policies implemented in Rhode Island in 1997 that required landlords to ensure that rental homes were free of lead hazards.”

    From Do Low Levels of Blood Lead Reduce Children's Future Test Scores? (2018) · cites this paper as Jones et al. 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, R. L., Homa, D. M., Meyer, P. A., Brody, D. J., Caldwell, K. L., Pirkle, J. L., & Brown, M. J.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2009-03-01
Volume
123
Issue
3
Pages
e376-e385
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2000130851
Cited by
312
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 31
FWCI
23.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Human Health and Disease
Keywords
blood lead levels, childhood lead poisoning, blood lead testing, temporal trends, risk factors, racial disparities, non-Hispanic Black children, Mexican American children, Medicaid, housing age, poverty, NHANES, children aged 1-5 years, lead exposure prevention, United States
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Lead, Lead Poisoning, Male, Mass Screening, Risk Factors, United States, Incidence, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review