Cited by 142Child Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Parenting attitudes and infant spanking: The influence of childhood experiences

Open access
Chung, Esther K., Mathew, Leny, Rothkopf, Amy C., Elo, Irma T., Coyne, James C., Culhane, Jennifer F.·2009·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess associations among maternal childhood experiences and subsequent parenting attitudes and use of infant spanking (IS), and determine if attitudes mediate the association between physical abuse exposure and IS. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of women who received prenatal care at community health centers in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Sociodemographic characteristics, adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), attitudes toward corporal punishment (CP), and IS use were assessed via face-to-face interviews, conducted at the first prenatal care visit, 3 months postpartum, and 11 months postpartum. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 1265 mostly black, low-income women. Nineteen percent of the participants valued CP as a means of discipline, and 14% reported IS use. Mothers exposed to childhood physical abuse and verbal hostility were more likely to report IS use than those not exposed (16% vs 10%, P = .002; 17% vs 12%, P = .02, respectively). In the adjusted analyses, maternal exposure to physical abuse, other ACEs, and valuing CP were independently associated with IS use. Attitudes that value CP did not mediate these associations. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers who had childhood experiences of violence were more likely to use IS than mothers without such experiences. Intergenerational transmission of CP was evident. Mothers who had experienced physical abuse as a child, when compared to those who had not, were 1.5 times more likely to use IS. Child discipline attitudes and maternal childhood experiences should be discussed early in parenting in order to prevent IS use, particularly among at-risk mothers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2008-3247

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies examining additive effects of multiple maltreatment experiences consistently indicated that a history of childhood abuse, neglect, and/or interparental violence was associated with greater likelihood of perpetrating physical abuse or neglect on one's children.

    “Studies in which the additive effects of multiple maltreatment experiences were examined consistently indicated that a history of childhood abuse, neglect, and/or interparental violence was associated with greater likelihood of perpetrating physical abuse or neglect on one’s children”

    From Intergenerational effects of childhood maltreatment: A systematic review of the parenting practices of adult survivors of childhood abuse, neglect, and violence. (2020) · cites this paper as Chung et al., 2009

    The Results and Discussion report that mothers with two or more adverse childhood experiences were more likely to spank their 11-month-old infants. That supports an association with a form of physical punishment, but the study did not assess childhood neglect or whether mothers perpetrated physical abuse or neglect of their children. It also cannot establish that multiple studies consistently found the claimed result. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies document a dose response in which multiple types of childhood victimization and/or repeated instances of maltreatment were associated with the greatest risk of adult perpetration.

    “Several studies document a dose response in which multiple types of childhood victimization and/or repeated instances of maltreatment were associated with the greatest risk of adult perpetration”

    From Intergenerational effects of childhood maltreatment: A systematic review of the parenting practices of adult survivors of childhood abuse, neglect, and violence. (2020) · cites this paper as Chung et al., 2009

    The Results (page unavailable) report that increasing numbers of adverse childhood experiences were associated with higher rates of infant spanking, and the Discussion reports a 1.6-times higher likelihood among mothers with at least two such experiences. The study supports a dose-response association for this specific form of adult behavior, but it does not establish the broader claim about adult perpetration or a dose response for repeated instances of maltreatment. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Attitudes related to corporal punishment did not moderate relationships between childhood abuse/neglect and physical punishment.

    “nor did attitudes related to corporal punishment (Chung et al., 2009).”

    From Intergenerational effects of childhood maltreatment: A systematic review of the parenting practices of adult survivors of childhood abuse, neglect, and violence. (2020) · cites this paper as Chung et al., 2009

    The Methods (Statistical Analysis) test whether corporal-punishment attitudes mediated the association between childhood physical abuse and infant spanking, and the Discussion says they did not. Mediation is distinct from moderation; the passages do not report a moderation test. The study also does not identify neglect among the childhood experiences it measured. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, E. K., Mathew, L., Rothkopf, A. C., Elo, I. T., Coyne, J. C., & Culhane, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2009-08-01
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
e278-e286
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2130031838
Cited by
142
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (TS-286-14/14)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD036462, 1-RO1-HD36462-01A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
corporal punishment, parenting attitudes, adverse childhood experiences, child physical abuse, verbal aggression, intergenerational transmission, maternal discipline, prenatal care, postpartum women
MeSH terms
Aggression, Attitude, Child Abuse, Child Rearing, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Infant, Mothers, Poverty, Pregnancy, Punishment, Risk Factors, Philadelphia, Parenting, Domestic Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review