The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the Probability of Neonatal Early-Onset Infection on the Basis of Maternal Risk Factors
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a quantitative model to estimate the probability of neonatal early-onset bacterial infection on the basis of maternal intrapartum risk factors. METHODS: This was a nested case-control study of infants born at ≥34 weeks' gestation at 14 California and Massachusetts hospitals from 1993 to 2007. Case-subjects had culture-confirmed bacterial infection at <72 hours; controls were randomly selected, frequency-matched 3:1 according to year and birth hospital. We performed multivariate analyses and split validation to define a predictive model based only on information available in the immediate perinatal period. RESULTS: We identified 350 case-subjects from a cohort of 608 014 live births. Highest intrapartum maternal temperature revealed a linear relationship with risk of infection below 100.5°F, above which the risk rose rapidly. Duration of rupture of membranes revealed a steadily increasing relationship with infection risk. Increased risk was associated with both late-preterm and postterm delivery. Risk associated with maternal group B Streptococcus colonization is diminished in the era of group B Streptococcus prophylaxis. Any form of intrapartum antibiotic given >4 hours before delivery was associated with decreased risk. Our model showed good discrimination and calibration (c statistic = 0.800 and Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .142 in the entire data set). CONCLUSIONS: A predictive model based on information available in the immediate perinatal period performs better than algorithms based on risk-factor threshold values. This model establishes a prior probability for newborn sepsis, which could be combined with neonatal physical examination and laboratory values to establish a posterior probability to guide treatment decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schuchat, A., Zywicki, S. S., Dinsmoor, M. J., Mercer, B., Romaguera, J., O'Sullivan, M. J., Patel, D., Peters, M. T., Stoll, B., Levine, O. S., et al. (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.105.1.21 · Cited by 351
Cited by
Big Data In Health Care: Using Analytics To Identify And Manage High-Risk And High-Cost Patients
Bates, D. W., Saria, S., Ohno-Machado, L., Shah, A., & Escobar, G. (2014) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0041 · Cited by 1,235
Self-citationShane, A. L., Sánchez, P. J., & Stoll, B. J. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31002-4 · Cited by 1,226
Goldstein, B. A., Navar, A. M., Pencina, M. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw042 · Cited by 936
Puopolo, K. M., Benitz, W. E., Zaoutis, T. E., COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES, Cummings, J., Juul, S., Hand, I., Eichenwald, E., Poindexter, B., et al. (2018) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2894 · Cited by 459
Self-citationChan, G. J., Lee, A. C., Baqui, A. H., Tan, J., & Black, R. E. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001502 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Puopolo, K. M., Draper, D., Wi, S., Newman, T. B., Zupancic, J., Lieberman, E., Smith, M., & Escobar, G. J.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2011-11-01
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e1155-e1163
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2120981099
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the Probability of Neonatal Early-Onset Infection on the Basis of Maternal Risk Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2010-3464
- The paper
- Puopolo, K. M., Draper, D., Wi, S., Newman, T. B., Zupancic, J., Lieberman, E., Smith, M., & Escobar, G. J. (2011). Estimating the Probability of Neonatal Early-Onset Infection on the Basis of Maternal Risk Factors. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3464
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.