Cited by 10Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Use of Antihistamines After Serious Allergic Reaction to Methimazole in Pediatric Graves’ Disease

Toderian, Amy B., Lawson, Margaret L.·2014·Pediatrics

Abstract

Antithyroid drugs are usually considered first-line therapy for management of pediatric Graves’ disease because they avoid permanent hypothyroidism, provide a chance for remission, and are less invasive than the alternatives of thyroidectomy or radioactive iodine. Methimazole (MMI) is the only antithyroid drug recommended in pediatrics due to the risk of propylthiouracil-induced liver toxicity. Allergic reactions with MMI occur in up to 10% of patients and, when mild, can be managed with concurrent antihistamine therapy. Guidelines recommend discontinuation of MMI with serious allergic reactions. We present the case of an adolescent girl with Graves’ disease and a serious allergic reaction after starting MMI whose family refused radioactive iodine and was reluctant to proceed to surgery. Antihistamine therapy was successfully used to allow continued treatment with MMI. This case demonstrates extension of management guidelines for minor cutaneous allergic reactions to MMI, through the use of antihistamines for a serious allergic reaction, allowing us to continue MMI and provide treatment consistent with the family’s preferences and values.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2013-1857

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A case report described a severe reaction to MMI consisting of rash, pruritis, and tongue and throat swelling that was successfully managed with antihistamine therapy, but this is not generally recommended because of the risk of anaphylaxis.

    “One recent case report described a more severe reaction to MMI consisting of rash, pruritis, and tongue and throat swelling that was successfully managed with antihistamine therapy, but this is not generally recommended because of the risk of anaphylaxis (162).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toderian, A. B., & Lawson, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Medicine, and
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
133
Issue
5
Pages
e1401-e1404
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2098224575
Cited by
10
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
methimazole, antihistamines, drug hypersensitivity, allergic reactions, pediatric Graves' disease, antithyroid drugs, propylthiouracil, drug-induced skin reaction, treatment continuation, patient and family preferences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Diphenhydramine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Hypersensitivity, Female, Graves Disease, Histamine H1 Antagonists, Humans, Methimazole, Antithyroid Agents, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review