CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 127Infant Development and Preterm CareMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Planned Birth Before 39 Weeks and Child Development: A Population-Based Study

Bentley, Jason P., Roberts, Christine L., Bowen, Jenny R., Martin, Andrew J., Morris, Jonathan M., Nassar, Natasha·2016·Pediatrics
DOI 10.1542/peds.2016-2002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of gestational age and mode of birth with early child development. METHODS: Population-based record linkage cohort study was conducted among 153 730 live-born infants of ≥32 weeks’ gestation with developmental assessments at school age, in New South Wales, Australia, 2002 to 2007. Children were assessed in 5 domains: physical health and well-being, language and cognition, social competence, emotional maturity, and general knowledge and communication. Children scoring in the bottom 10% of national domains were considered developmentally vulnerable, and children developmentally vulnerable for ≥2 domains were classified as developmentally high risk (DHR), the primary outcome. Robust multivariable Poisson models were used to obtain individual and combined adjusted relative risks (aRRs) of gestational age and mode of birth for DHR children. RESULTS: Overall, 9.6% of children were DHR. The aRR (95% confidence interval) of being DHR increased with decreasing gestational age (referent: 40 weeks); 32 to 33 weeks 1.25 (1.08–1.44), 34 to 36 weeks 1.26 (1.18–1.34), 37 weeks 1.17 (1.10–1.25), 38 weeks 1.06 (1.01–1.10), 39 weeks 0.98 (0.94–1.02), ≥41 weeks 0.99 (0.94–1.03), and for labor induction or prelabor cesarean delivery (planned birth; referent: vaginal birth after spontaneous labor), 1.07 (1.04–1.11). The combined aRR for planned birth was 1.26 (1.18–1.34) at 37 weeks and 1.13 (1.08–1.19) at 38 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Early (at <39 weeks) planned birth is associated with an elevated risk of poor child development at school age. The timing of planned birth is modifiable, and strategies to inform more judicious decision-making are needed to ensure optimal child health and development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2016-2002

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Australian Government, 2013, A Snapshot of Early Childhood Development in Australia 2012: Australian Early Development Index (AEDI) National Report
  2. Healthy Child Manitoba, 2013, Starting Early, Starting Strong: The Early Development Instrument (EDI) Report 2012–2013
  3. Taylor, 2000, Validation Study: NSW Midwives Data Collection 1998
  4. Hilder, 2014, Stillbirths in Australia, 1991–2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 127

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bentley, J. P., Roberts, C. L., Bowen, J. R., Martin, A. J., Morris, J. M., & Nassar, N.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU)
  • Royal North Shore Hospital (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Pediatrics
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Published
2016-12-01
Volume
138
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
DOI
10.1542/peds.2016-2002
OpenAlex
W2551385132
Cited by
127
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • NSW Ministry of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Keywords
preterm birth, gestational age, mode of delivery, labor induction, child development, developmental vulnerability, elementary school students, language and cognition, social competence, emotional maturity
MeSH terms
Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Labor, Induced, Male, New South Wales, Patient Care Planning, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Risk Assessment, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review