Cited by 40Child Welfare and AdoptionFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsChild Abuse and Trauma

Family well-being in grandparent- versus parent-headed households

Rapoport, Eli, Muthiah, Nallammai, Keim, Sarah A., Adesman, Andrew·2020·PEDIATRICS

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the 2% of US children being raised by their grandparents. We sought to characterize and compare grandparent- and parent-headed households with respect to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), child temperament, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and caregiver aggravation and coping. METHODS: Using a combined data set of children ages 3 to 17 from the 2016, 2017, and 2018 National Survey of Children’s Health, we applied survey regression procedures, adjusted for sociodemographic confounders, to compare grandparent- and parent-headed households on composite and single-item outcome measures of ACEs; ADHD; preschool inattention and restlessness; child temperament; and caregiver aggravation, coping, support, and interactions with children. RESULTS: Among 80 646 households (2407 grandparent-headed, 78 239 parent-headed), children in grandparent-headed households experienced more ACEs (β = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 1.38). Preschool-aged and school-aged children in grandparent-headed households were more likely to have ADHD (adjusted odds ratio = 4.29, 95% CI: 2.22 to 8.28; adjusted odds ratio = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.20). School-aged children in these households had poorer temperament (βadj = .25, 95% CI: −0.63 to 1.14), and their caregivers experienced greater aggravation (βadj = .29, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.49). However, these differences were not detected after excluding children with ADHD from the sample. No differences were noted between grandparent- and parent-headed households for caregiver coping, emotional support, or interactions with children. CONCLUSIONS: Despite caring for children with greater developmental problems and poorer temperaments, grandparent caregivers seem to cope with parenting about as well as parents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2020-0115

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rapoport, E., Muthiah, N., Keim, S. A., & Adesman, A.
Affiliations
  • Schneider Children's Hospital (US)
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
  • Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US)
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2020-09-01
Volume
146
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W3047108556
Cited by
40
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
grandparent-headed households, adverse childhood experiences, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, child temperament, caregiver coping, family well-being
MeSH terms
Grandparents, Adverse Childhood Experiences, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Family Health, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Psychomotor Agitation, Social Support, Temperament, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Parenting, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Single-Parent Family

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review