The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Prenatal Nutritional Supplementation in New York City
Abstract
This randomized controlled trial of nutritional supplementation in pregnancy, in a poor black urban population in the United States, aimed to increase the birth weight and influence the postnatal development of the offspring of mothers at high risk of having low birth weight infants. The execution of the research design and adherence to the treatment regimen among the experimental population appeared adequate for a reasonable test of the treatments. At birth, the only significant favorable effect of supplementation observed was the prevention of depressed birth weight among the offspring of mothers who smoked heavily. With balanced protein-calorie supplementation, length of gestation was increased, the proportion of low-birth-weight infants reduced, and mean birth weight raised by 41 gm (not statistically significant). With high protein supplementation, there was an excess of very early premature births and associated neonatal deaths, and there was significant growth retardation up to 37 weeks of gestation. At 1 year of age, significant effects of high protein supplement were found on three psychological measures: visual habituation, visual dishabituation, and mean length of free play episodes. These measures were unrelated to measures of growth at birth and at 1 year of age. There were no detectable residual adverse effects of high protein supplementation at 1 year of age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Developmental Origins of the Metabolic Syndrome: Prediction, Plasticity, and Programming
Mcmillen, I. C., & Robinson, J. S. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00053.2003 · Cited by 1,910
Energy and protein intake in pregnancy
Kramer, M. S., & Kakuma, R. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000032 · Cited by 431
Diet and Healthy Lifestyle in the Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Rasmussen, L., Poulsen, C. W., Kampmann, U., Smedegaard, S. B., Ovesen, P. G., & Fuglsang, J. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12103050 · Cited by 304
Can targeted transfers improve birth outcomes?
Hoynes, H., Page, M., & Stevens, A. H. (2011) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.006 · Cited by 233
Fetal Programming of Cardiovascular Function through Exposure to Maternal Undernutrition
Langley-Evans, S. C. (2001) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2001111 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Rush, D., Stein, Z., & Susser, M.
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 1980-04-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 683-697
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W1934403263
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Prenatal Nutritional Supplementation in New York City. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.65.4.683
- The paper
- Rush, D., Stein, Z., & Susser, M. (1980). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Prenatal Nutritional Supplementation in New York City. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.65.4.683
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.