The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Children's Access to Primary Care: Differences by Race, Income, and Insurance Status
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Congressional initiatives to reduce spending under major public programs designed to improve access to health care have brought renewed attention to the health care needs of traditionally disadvantaged populations. The objective of this study was to assess access to and use of primary care services for poor, minority, and uninsured children in the United States. DESIGN AND SETTING: We analyzed data on 7578 1- to 17-year-old children of families responding to the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey, a nationally representative sample of families and children. OUTCOME MEASURES: Adult respondents were asked to report on several measures of access and use of care for children in the household. These included the presence of a usual source of care and its characteristics (type of site, travel time, waiting time, after-hours care, and availability of a regular physician). We also examined the volume of physician contacts relative to the sample child's health status, the receipt of measles vaccinations, and whether children received care in response to selected symptoms of ill health. Results are presented for children generally and for four subgroups: poor children; minority children; uninsured children; and white, non-poor, insured children (the reference group). RESULTS: Poor, minority, and uninsured children fared consistently worse than the children in the reference group on all indicators studied. For example, children in each of the three at-risk groups were twice as likely as the children in the reference group to lack usual sources of care, nearly twice as likely to wait 60 minutes or more at their sites of care, and used only about half as many physician services after adjusting for health status. Multivariate analyses revealed that poverty, minority status, and absence of insurance exert independent effects on access to and use of primary care. CONCLUSIONS: The existence of substantial barriers to the access to and use of primary care for low-income, minority, and uninsured children is cause for significant concern, especially in an era of program cutbacks. New initiatives are needed to address both financial and non-financial barriers to the receipt of primary care for disenfranchised children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and Health
STARFIELD, B., SHI, L., & MACINKO, J. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x · Cited by 5,507
Reiss, F. (2013) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.026 · Cited by 2,062
Liptak, G. S., Benzoni, L. B., Mruzek, D. W., Nolan, K. W., Thingvoll, M. A., Wade, C. M., & Fryer, G. E. (2008) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/dbp.0b013e318165c7a0 · Cited by 504
Dunlop, S., Coyte, P. C., & McIsaac, W. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00424-4 · Cited by 483
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Access to and Use of Health Care Services, 1977 to 1996
Weinick, R. M., Zuvekas, S. H., & Cohen, J. W. (2000) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558700057001s03 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Newacheck, P. W., Hughes, D. C., & Stoddard, J. J.
- Venue
- PEDIATRICS
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-32
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146549276
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Children's Access to Primary Care: Differences by Race, Income, and Insurance Status. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.97.1.26
- The paper
- Newacheck, P. W., Hughes, D. C., & Stoddard, J. J. (1996). Children's Access to Primary Care: Differences by Race, Income, and Insurance Status. PEDIATRICS. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.97.1.26
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.