The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Viewshed and Cost Surface Analysis Using GIS (Cartographic Modelling in a Cell-Based GIS II)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The first strand of the critique of archaeological GIS visibility studies comprises a catalogue of methodological problems classified as procedural or pragmatic.
“The first strand of this critique comprises a catalogue of methodological problems that Wheatley and Gillings (2000, p.2) classify as either procedural (see also van Leusen 1999) or pragmatic.”
From Visibility Studies in Archaeology: A Review and Case Study (2003) · cites this paper as van Leusen 1999
Citations
Cites
Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology
Llobera, M. (1996) · Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00083745 · Cited by 203
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Visibility Studies in Archaeology: A Review and Case Study
Lake, M. W., & Woodman, P. E. (2003) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b29122 · Cited by 110
Yaworsky, P. M., Vernon, K. B., Spangler, J. D., Brewer, S. C., & Codding, B. F. (2020) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239424 · Cited by 104
Intxaurbe, I., Arriolabengoa, M., Medina-Alcaide, M. Á., Rivero, O., Rios-Garaizar, J., Salazar, S., Líbano, I., & Garate, D. (2021) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2020.105271 · Cited by 21
Thomas, K. (2022) · Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology · doi:10.5334/jcaa.98 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Unknown, (.
- Venue
- Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
- Publisher
- Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
- Published
- 1999
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
