Cited by 33Embodied and Extended CognitionMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Science and Education Research

Tracing the Roots of Cognition in Predictive Processing

Open access
Pezzulo, Giovanni·2017·Theoretical Philosophy/MIND Group – JGU Mainz

Abstract

Can PP (Predictive Processing) help us understand "the roots of cognition", and how we may have acquired (during evolution and/or development) our sophisticated cognitive abilities from the relatively simpler adaptive control mechanisms of our early evolutionary ancestors? Here I make the case that some cognitive operations may be constructed as detached actions - where the detachment process rests on the construction of generative PP models, which permit one to internalize action-environment dynamics. I provide three examples. The first example focuses on the role of internally-generated sequences of (hippocampal) neuronal activity across goal-directed navigation and detached tasks such as planning. This example illustrates how neuronal sequences (putatively forming an internal model for spatial navigation) may have a “dual use”: they may support both overt navigation and covert cognitive operations while running, respectively, in stimulus-based and internally-generated modes. Furthermore, the latter (internally-generated) mode may be considered a form of internalization of the former (stimulus-based) mode. The second example focuses on actions to resolve epistemic uncertainty, and the formal similarity in PP between epistemic actions that are executed overtly (e.g., exploration) and those executed covertly (e.g., episodic retrieval). This example illustrates the possibility of defining mental actions, such as reducing one’s uncertainty before making a choice, as internalize…

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.15502/9783958573215

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The agent's model must be able to entertain counterfactually rich representations, i.e., beliefs about several alternative potential actions and the states of affairs these actions would bring about.

    “Hence the agent’s model must be able to entertain ‘counterfactually rich’ representations; i.e., beliefs about several alternative potential actions and the states of affairs that these actions would bring about”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pezzulo, G.
Corresponding author
Pezzulo, Giovanni
Venue
Theoretical Philosophy/MIND Group – JGU Mainz
Publisher
Theoretical Philosophy/MIND Group – JGU Mainz
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2701645347
Cited by
33
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
predictive processing, internal models, goal-directed navigation, planning, epistemic uncertainty, exploration, episodic memory retrieval, information foraging, cognitive objectives, perception-action loop, embodied cognition, enactivism, cognitive evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review