Tracing the Roots of Cognition in Predictive Processing
Open accessAbstract
Can PP (Predictive Processing) help us understand "the roots of cognition", and how we may have acquired (during evolution and/or development) our sophisticated cognitive abilities from the relatively simpler adaptive control mechanisms of our early evolutionary ancestors? Here I make the case that some cognitive operations may be constructed as detached actions - where the detachment process rests on the construction of generative PP models, which permit one to internalize action-environment dynamics. I provide three examples. The first example focuses on the role of internally-generated sequences of (hippocampal) neuronal activity across goal-directed navigation and detached tasks such as planning. This example illustrates how neuronal sequences (putatively forming an internal model for spatial navigation) may have a “dual use”: they may support both overt navigation and covert cognitive operations while running, respectively, in stimulus-based and internally-generated modes. Furthermore, the latter (internally-generated) mode may be considered a form of internalization of the former (stimulus-based) mode. The second example focuses on actions to resolve epistemic uncertainty, and the formal similarity in PP between epistemic actions that are executed overtly (e.g., exploration) and those executed covertly (e.g., episodic retrieval). This example illustrates the possibility of defining mental actions, such as reducing one’s uncertainty before making a choice, as internalize…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The agent's model must be able to entertain counterfactually rich representations, i.e., beliefs about several alternative potential actions and the states of affairs these actions would bring about.
“Hence the agent’s model must be able to entertain ‘counterfactually rich’ representations; i.e., beliefs about several alternative potential actions and the states of affairs that these actions would bring about”
From 'Seeing the Dark': Grounding Phenomenal Transparency and Opacity in Precision Estimation for Active Inference (2018) · cites this paper as Pezzulo, 2017
Cites
The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?
Friston, K. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2787 · Cited by 8,120 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In this article, I will focus on active inference (under the Free Energy principle, (Friston 2010)), which starts from a predictive coding scheme but extends it to cover the domain of action control.”
BackgroundMethodRao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/4580 · Cited by 5,483 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In this domain, predictive coding (Rao and Ballard 1999) emphasized the importance of a hierarchical (Bayesian) scheme, in which higher levels convey predictions to lower levels, and lower levels convey prediction errors to higher levels, with this process being iterated until prediction error is…”
BackgroundGallagher, S. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199271941.001.0001 · Cited by 3,311 · see citing works
The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2087 · Cited by 1,836 · see citing works
Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self
Seth, A. K. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007 · Cited by 1,816 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In active inference, one can describe adaptive control loops by starting from cybernetic error-correction mechanisms (Butz 2016; Pezzulo et al. 2015; Seth 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action
Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1 · Cited by 1,641 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…is “externalized” or off-loaded to the environment, as in the case of using a computer (or even an abacus) to do maths, or rotating Tetris pieces to aid in deciding where to place them (the latter was indeed an early example of “epistemic action” in the literature, cf. Kirsh and Maglio 1994).”
BackgroundThe emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception
Grush, R. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000093 · Cited by 1,387 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…Piaget’s proposals on the construction of intelligence from sensorimotor experience (Piaget and Cook 1952); but also in many more recent variants (Clark and Grush 1999; Cotterill 1998; Hesslow 2002; Grush 2004) and especially under the theoretical umbrella of action-oriented representation (AOR).”
InfluentialNeural ensembles in CA3 transiently encode paths forward of the animal at a decision point
Johnson, A., & Redish, A. D. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3761-07.2007 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
What Learning Systems do Intelligent Agents Need? Complementary Learning Systems Theory Updated
Kumaran, D., Hassabis, D., & McClelland, J. L. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.004 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control
Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F., & Friston, K. (2015) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.001 · Cited by 650 · cited 10× · see citing works
“Finally, in AOR, the relations between action (sensorimotor) control and the adaptive processes of homeostatic regulation (and associated sensorimotor loops) have rarely been investigated, but they may be important for linking actions and motivations and for constructing notions of cognitive goals that go beyond the e…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationActive inference, communication and hermeneutics
Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.025 · Cited by 266 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…control) as well as other domains including interoception, awareness and consciousness (Clark 2015; Clark 2016; Donnarumma et al. 2017; Hohwy 2013; Friston et al. 2013; Friston and Frith 2015a; Friston and Frith 2015b; Friston et al. 2016a; Pezzulo and Rigoli 2011, Seth 2013; Stoianov et al. 2016).”
BackgroundInternally generated sequences in learning and executing goal-directed behavior
Pezzulo, G., van der Meer, M. A. A., Lansink, C. S., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.011 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Sense of Confidence during Probabilistic Learning: A Normative Account
Meyniel, F., Schlunegger, D., & Dehaene, S. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004305 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F., & Chersi, F. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00092 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Limanowski, J., & Friston, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00643 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
“Hence the agent’s model must be able to entertain ‘counterfactually rich’ representations; i.e., beliefs about several alternative potential actions and the states of affairs that these actions would bring about (Friston et al., 2014, 2017c; Seth, 2014; Pezzulo, 2017; cf. Powers, 1973/2005).”
BackgroundWilliams, D. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1768-x · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Deane, G. (2021) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niab024 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Selection of optimal action policies involves having counterfactually rich expectations of the states of affairs that would be brought about contingent on actions (Seth 2014; Pezzulo 2017; Friston et al. 2017a).”
Background
- Authors
- Pezzulo, G.
- Corresponding author
- Pezzulo, Giovanni
- ORCID
- Pezzulo, Giovanni
- Venue
- Theoretical Philosophy/MIND Group – JGU Mainz
- Publisher
- Theoretical Philosophy/MIND Group – JGU Mainz
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W2701645347
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- predictive processing, internal models, goal-directed navigation, planning, epistemic uncertainty, exploration, episodic memory retrieval, information foraging, cognitive objectives, perception-action loop, embodied cognition, enactivism, cognitive evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review