Cited by 266Embodied and Extended CognitionAction Observation and SynchronizationCognitive Science and Education Research

Active inference, communication and hermeneutics

Open access
Friston, Karl J., Frith, Christopher D.·2015·Cortex

Abstract

Hermeneutics refers to interpretation and translation of text (typically ancient scriptures) but also applies to verbal and non-verbal communication. In a psychological setting it nicely frames the problem of inferring the intended content of a communication. In this paper, we offer a solution to the problem of neural hermeneutics based upon active inference. In active inference, action fulfils predictions about how we will behave (e.g., predicting we will speak). Crucially, these predictions can be used to predict both self and others--during speaking and listening respectively. Active inference mandates the suppression of prediction errors by updating an internal model that generates predictions--both at fast timescales (through perceptual inference) and slower timescales (through perceptual learning). If two agents adopt the same model, then--in principle--they can predict each other and minimise their mutual prediction errors. Heuristically, this ensures they are singing from the same hymn sheet. This paper builds upon recent work on active inference and communication to illustrate perceptual learning using simulated birdsongs. Our focus here is the neural hermeneutics implicit in learning, where communication facilitates long-term changes in generative models that are trying to predict each other. In other words, communication induces perceptual learning and enables others to (literally) change our minds and vice versa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.025

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From an FEP-AI perspective, this coupling relationship is one of mutual modeling and collaborative inference.

    “From an FEP-AI perspective, this coupling relationship is one of mutual modeling and collaborative inference (Friston and Frith, 2015; Friston, 2017; Kirchhoff et al., 2018; Palacios et al., 2019).”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Friston and Frith, 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hunt B. Ott E. Yorke J. Differentiable synchronisation of chaos Physical Review E 55 1997 4029 4034

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Friston, Karl J.
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
68
Pages
129-143
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004652753
Cited by
266
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (088139/Z/09/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
active inference, communication, perceptual learning, generative models, prediction error, internal models, bird song, social learning
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Communication, Humans, Learning, Reading, Vocalization, Animal, Comprehension, Anticipation, Psychological, Hermeneutics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review