Cited by 34EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesTreatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback in Depression: Three case studies

Open access
Grin-Yatsenko, Vera A., Othmer, Siegfried, Ponomarev, Valery A., Evdokimov, Sergey A., Konoplev, Yuri Y., Kropotov, Juri D.·2018·NeuroRegulation

Abstract

Electroencephalographic (EEG) findings on depressive patients indicate theta and alpha activity higher than in normal controls. Extensive literature reports on the effectiveness of neurofeedback techniques in the treatment of cognitive and behavioral disorders by training the patients to modulate their brain activities, as reflected in their electroencephalogram. Three unmedicated depressed individuals participated in this study of Infra Low Frequency Neurofeedback (ILF NF) training. Along with the pre- and post-treatment Depression Rating Scales assessment, quantitative EEGs (qEEG) were recorded in Eyes open and Eyes closed resting states and during the visual cued GO/NOGO task before and after 20 sessions of training. Along with remission of the clinical symptoms of depression, significant decrease of theta power over frontal and central areas was observed in all three patients under all test conditions. These qEEG dynamics might be a correlate of ILF NF related recovery of the appropriate level of frontal cortical activation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15540/nr.5.1.30

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ayers, M. E. (1987). Electroencephalographic neurofeedback and closed head injury of 250 individuals. In National Head Injury Syllabus (pp. 380-392). Washington, DC: Head Injury Foundation.
  2. Baehr, E., & Baehr, R. (1997). The use of neurofeedback as adjunctive therapeutic treatment for depression: Three case studies. Biofeedback, 25(1), 10-11.
  3. Baehr, E., Rosenfeld, J. P., & Baehr, R. (1998). The clinical use of an alpha asymmetry biofeedback protocol in treatment of depressive disorders: Two case studies. Journal of Neurotherapy, 2, 12-27.
  4. Davidson, R. J., & Henriques, J. (2000). Regional brain function in sadness and depression. In J. C. Borod (Ed.), The neuropsychology of emotion. Series in affective science (pp. 269-297). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  5. Dias, Á. M., & van Deusen, A. (2011). A new neurofeedback protocol for depression. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(01), 374-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209 /rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1. · DOI
  6. Othmer, S., Othmer, S. F., & Kaiser, D. A. (1999). EEG biofeedback: An emerging model for its global efficacy. In J. R. Evans & A. Abarbanel (Eds.), Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback (pp. 243-310). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  7. Othmer, S., Othmer, S., & Legarda, S. B. (2011). Clinical neurofeedback: Training brain behavior. Treatment Strategies -Pediatric Neurology and Psychiatry, 2(1), 67-73.
  8. Othmer, S. F. (2017). Protocol Guide for Neurofeedback Clinicians (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: EEG Info. Vol. 5(1):30-42 2018 doi:10.15540/nr.5.1.30

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grin-Yatsenko, V. A., Othmer, S., Ponomarev, V. A., Evdokimov, S. A., Konoplev, Y. Y., & Kropotov, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • St Petersburg University (RU)
Venue
NeuroRegulation
Published
2018-03-30
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
30
ISSN
2373-0587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794797996
Cited by
34
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
NeuroRegulation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
depression, theta power, alpha activity, quantitative EEG, go/no-go task, resting state, untreated depression, depression remission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review