Cited by 5Indian and Buddhist StudiesChinese history and philosophyStudy and Philosophy of Religion

Did I-ching Go to India?: Problems in Using I-ching as a Source for South Asian Buddhism

Barrett, T. H.·1998·Buddhist Studies Review

Abstract

.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1558/bsrv.v15i2.14697

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrett, T. H.
Corresponding author
Barrett, T. H.
Venue
Buddhist Studies Review
Published
1998-06-16
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
142-156
ISSN
  • 0265-2897 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-9681
OpenAlex
W3139445996
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Buddhist Studies Review (publishedVersion)
  • SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Book of Changes, Chinese Buddhist literature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review