The DOI matches its Crossref record.
1947 Partition of India and Pakistan: Migration, Material Landscapes, and the Making of Nations
Abstract
The nation state, as a concept, relies on an assumption of boundedness—on the idea that governable units are culturally unified and locationally discrete. Displacement often works to make this boundedness a material reality. Demographics are reshuffled in accordance with essentialist understandings of cultural origins. Yet, displacement also exposes the impossibility of a national sovereignty based neatly on historic spatiality. Even if people are ‘going home’ to what is seen to be an ancestral homeland, they are leaving familiar landscapes shaped by their own personal pasts. In this paper, we discuss the 1947 Partition of India and Pakistan as an example. We describe the yet contended uses and meanings of built landscapes associated with out-migrating Partition refugees on both sides of the border. Through this example, we assert that displacement is not a singular moment, but a long, drawn out negotiation of access and national belonging. Thus, archaeologies of forced and undocumented migration must not begin and end in discussion of hardship-filled border crossings and momentary homelessness. We must also consider the anxiety of post-journey existence within material landscapes that evidence the recent and long-standing occupations of others.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Undocumented migration must not begin and end with crossings, but must include postjourney existence within material landscapes where belonging is cultivated through a propinquity through dwelling.
“In describing the dwellings of peoples displaced in the aftermath of the 1947 Partition of India and Pakistan, Riggs & Jatt (2017) make the simple but important observation that undocumented migration must not begin and end with crossings, but must include postjourney existence within material landscapes where belonging is cultivated through”
From The Work of Boundaries: Critical Cartographies and the Archaeological Record of the Relatively Recent Past (2022) · cites this paper as Riggs & Jatt 2017
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Materiality and Heritage of Contemporary Forced Migration
McGuire, R. H. (2020) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-010220-074624 · Cited by 25
Hauser, M. W. (2022) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110141 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Riggs, E., & Jat, Z. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Contemporary Archaeology
- Publisher
- Equinox Publishing
- Published
- 2017-07-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-146
- ISSN
- 2051-3437
- 2051-3429
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review