Cited by 55COVID-19 epidemiological studiesInfection Control and VentilationSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

COVID-19 outbreak among attendees of an exercise facility—Chicago, Illinois, August–September 2020

Open access
Lendacki, Frances R., Teran, Richard A., Gretsch, Stephanie, Fricchione, Marielle J., Kerins, Janna L.·2021·MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

On September 8, 2020, the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) was notified of a potential outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at an exercise facility.COVID-19 cases were identified among 55 (68%) of 81 attendees of in-person classes held during August 24-September 1, 2020, including 49 (60%) cases confirmed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing and six (7%) probable cases among attendees who had compatible symptoms but negative or no RT-PCR test results.Overall, 43 (78%) attendees with COVID-19 participated in multiple classes while potentially infectious.*Twenty-two (40%) attendees with COVID-19 attended on or after the day of symptom onset.Among 58 exercise class attendees who provided information on in-class behaviors, 44 (76%) reported infrequent mask use, including 32 of 38 (84%) attendees with COVID-19 and 12 of 20 (60%) without COVID-19.The increased respiratory exertion that occurs in the enclosed spaces of indoor exercise facilities facilitates transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in these settings (1,2).To reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission in exercise facilities, employees and patrons should wear a mask, even during high-intensity activities when ≥6 ft apart.In addition, facilities should provide engineering and administrative controls including 1) improving ventilation; 2) enforcing consistent and correct mask use and physical distancing (maintaining ≥6 ft of distance between all persons and limiting physical contact, class size, and crowded spaces); 3) reminding infected employees and patrons to stay home and away from others for ≥10 days after symptom onset or, if asymptomatic, after a positive test result, as well as to observe quarantine guidance after close contact with a person with COVID-19 and while awaiting test results; and 4) increasing opportunities for hand hygiene.Conducting exercise activities entirely outdoors or virtually could further reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk.* The infectious period was presumed to begin 2 days before symptom onset or positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, whichever was known to be first, and presumed to end ≥10 days after symptom onset or positive test result as long as other symptoms (except loss of taste or smell) were improving and the patient had been fever-free for 24 hours without fever-reducing medication.https://www. cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/end-home-isolation.html

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm7009e2

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Laboratory, field, modelling, and case studies have shown that airborne transmission through inhalation of virus-laden aerosol is important, if not dominant, for COVID-19.

    “Laboratory, field, modelling, and case studies have shown that airborne transmission through the inhalation of a virus-laden aerosol is important, if not dominant, for COVID-19.119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lendacki, F. R., Teran, R. A., Gretsch, S., Fricchione, M. J., & Kerins, J. L.
Affiliations
Chicago Department of Public Health (US)
Corresponding author
Lendacki, Frances R.
Venue
MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2021-03-05
Volume
70
Issue
9
Pages
321-325
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W3130246716
Cited by
55
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 26
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, masking, social distancing, ventilation, infectious period, quarantine, hand hygiene, outbreak control measures, Chicago, RT-PCR testing, contact tracing, outdoor exercise, asymptomatic transmission
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chicago, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Fitness Centers, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review